Seek Returns

NWG vs. RF: NatWest vs. Regions Financial Stock Comparison

How do NatWest (NWG) and Regions Financial (RF) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

NatWest (NWG) and Regions Financial (RF) both belong to the Banks industry, though NWG is classified under Diversified Banks while RF falls under Regional Banks.

Regions Financial (RF) trades as ordinary local shares, while NatWest (NWG) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for NatWest (NWG) and Regions Financial (RF)
Profile ItemNWGRF
NameNatWest Group plc Sponsored ADRRegions Financial Corp.
Country/RegionUnited KingdomUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS Industry GroupBanksBanks
GICS IndustryBanksBanks
GICS Sub-IndustryDiversified BanksRegional Banks
Market Capitalization61.54 billion USD24.06 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 18, 2007March 17, 1980
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

NWG
RF
GSPC
Loading price history…
NatWest (NWG) vs. Regions Financial (RF), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for NatWest (NWG) and Regions Financial (RF). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for NatWest (NWG) and Regions Financial (RF). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for NatWest (NWG) and Regions Financial (RF)
MetricNWGRF
Total Return (1Y)7.03%22.28%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)59.12%30.40%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)30.15%8.09%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

NWG
RF
GSPC
Loading price history…
NatWest (NWG) vs. Regions Financial (RF), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for NatWest (NWG) and Regions Financial (RF). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for NatWest (NWG) and Regions Financial (RF)
MetricNWGRF
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)33.39%23.37%
Beta (5Y)0.961.00
Max Drawdown (5Y)-40.66%-40.99%
Avg. Volume (3M)3.73M9.26M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
NWG and RF are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for NatWest (NWG) and Regions Financial (RF)
MetricNWGRF
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.080.77
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.121.11

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

NatWest (NWG) at 14.58% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Regions Financial (RF) at 12.38% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for NWG.

NWG

Banks industry group

14.58%

Max
19.84%
NWG
14.58%
Q3
13.67%
Median
11.49%
Q1
9.50%
Min
3.64%

RF

Banks industry group

12.38%

Max
19.84%
Q3
13.67%
RF
12.38%
Median
11.49%
Q1
9.50%
Min
3.64%
Loading chart…
NatWest (NWG) vs. Regions Financial (RF): A comparison of their ROE against the Banks industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

NatWest (NWG) at 36.93% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Regions Financial (RF) at 31.29%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

NWG

Banks industry group

36.93%

Max
47.19%
NWG
36.93%
Q3
35.25%
Median
31.21%
Q1
27.11%
Min
14.93%

RF

Banks industry group

31.29%

Max
47.19%
Q3
35.25%
RF
31.29%
Median
31.21%
Q1
27.11%
Min
14.93%
Loading chart…
NatWest (NWG) vs. Regions Financial (RF): A comparison of their net margin against the Banks industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for NatWest (NWG) in Banks and Regions Financial (RF) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for NatWest (NWG) and Regions Financial (RF)
MetricNWGRF
ROE (TTM)14.58%12.38%
ROA (TTM)0.85%1.42%
Net Margin (TTM)36.93%31.29%
Operating Margin (TTM)----
Gross Margin (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both NatWest (NWG) at 13.35% and Regions Financial (RF) at 6.25% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
NatWest (NWG) vs. Regions Financial (RF): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both NatWest (NWG) at 26.93% and Regions Financial (RF) at 19.17% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
NatWest (NWG) vs. Regions Financial (RF): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for NatWest (NWG) and Regions Financial (RF)
MetricNWGRF
Revenue Growth (YoY)13.35%6.25%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)7.55%1.65%
EPS Growth (YoY)26.93%19.17%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)26.12%0.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: NatWest (NWG) in Banks and Regions Financial (RF) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: NatWest (NWG) in Banks and Regions Financial (RF) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for NatWest (NWG) and Regions Financial (RF)
MetricNWGRF
Current Ratio (MRQ)----
Debt / Equity (MRQ)----
Net Debt / EBITDA----

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Regions Financial (RF) at 3.85% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while NatWest (NWG) at 2.19% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, RF the richer one.

NWG

Banks industry group

2.19%

Max
5.79%
Q3
3.18%
Median
2.39%
NWG
2.19%
Q1
1.20%
Min
0.00%

RF

Banks industry group

3.85%

Max
5.79%
RF
3.85%
Q3
3.18%
Median
2.39%
Q1
1.20%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
NatWest (NWG) vs. Regions Financial (RF): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Banks industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both NatWest (NWG) at 47.43% and Regions Financial (RF) at 43.27% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.

NWG

Banks industry group

47.43%

Max
70.75%
NWG
47.43%
Q3
41.28%
Median
29.26%
Q1
18.98%
Min
0.00%

RF

Banks industry group

43.27%

Max
70.75%
RF
43.27%
Q3
41.28%
Median
29.26%
Q1
18.98%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
NatWest (NWG) vs. Regions Financial (RF): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Banks industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for NatWest (NWG) and Regions Financial (RF)
MetricNWGRF
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.19%3.85%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)47.43%43.27%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

NatWest (NWG) at 7.84 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Regions Financial (RF) at 11.10 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for NWG, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

NWG

Banks industry group

7.84

Max
18.16
Q3
13.75
Median
11.81
Q1
10.64
NWG
7.84
Min
6.49

RF

Banks industry group

11.10

Max
18.16
Q3
13.75
Median
11.81
RF
11.10
Q1
10.64
Min
6.49
Loading chart…
NatWest (NWG) vs. Regions Financial (RF): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Banks industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

P/S ratio is set aside for both NatWest (NWG) in Banks and Regions Financial (RF) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both NatWest (NWG) at 1.20 and Regions Financial (RF) at 1.46 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

NWG

Banks industry group

1.20

Max
2.28
Q3
1.58
Median
1.32
NWG
1.20
Q1
1.10
Min
0.59

RF

Banks industry group

1.46

Max
2.28
Q3
1.58
RF
1.46
Median
1.32
Q1
1.10
Min
0.59
Loading chart…
NatWest (NWG) vs. Regions Financial (RF): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Banks industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for NatWest (NWG) and Regions Financial (RF)
MetricNWGRF
P/E Ratio (TTM)7.8411.10
P/S Ratio (TTM)----
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.201.46
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)----