Seek Returns logo

NVR vs. TPR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at NVR and TPR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolNVRTPR
Company NameNVR, Inc.Tapestry, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization21.43 billion USD24.18 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 22, 1985October 6, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NVR and TPR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NVR vs. TPR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolNVRTPR
5-Day Price Return-3.90%1.08%
13-Week Price Return0.73%22.56%
26-Week Price Return9.10%79.46%
52-Week Price Return-17.67%155.71%
Month-to-Date Return-3.46%3.17%
Year-to-Date Return-5.16%78.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.02M2.63M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.02M3.84M
3-Month Volatility28.08%43.43%
Beta1.031.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NVR

37.35%

Household Durables Industry

Max
27.70%
Q3
17.40%
Median
12.87%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-5.50%

NVR’s Return on Equity of 37.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TPR

10.99%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
42.05%
Q3
24.41%
Median
17.18%
Q1
7.87%
Min
-8.23%

TPR’s Return on Equity of 10.99% is on par with the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NVR vs. TPR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NVR

14.18%

Household Durables Industry

Max
16.37%
Q3
9.18%
Median
6.63%
Q1
3.85%
Min
-3.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.18% places NVR in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TPR

2.61%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
6.06%
Q1
3.93%
Min
-3.05%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Net Profit Margin of 2.61% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

NVR vs. TPR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NVR

18.55%

Household Durables Industry

Max
21.32%
Q3
12.25%
Median
9.93%
Q1
5.57%
Min
-1.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.55% places NVR in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TPR

4.21%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
11.68%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.12%

TPR’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.21% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

NVR vs. TPR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolNVRTPR
Return on Equity (TTM)37.35%10.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)24.32%2.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.18%2.61%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.55%4.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)25.28%75.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NVR

3.36

Household Durables Industry

Max
6.09
Q3
3.79
Median
2.54
Q1
1.23
Min
0.83

NVR’s Current Ratio of 3.36 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TPR

1.87

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
2.22
Median
1.61
Q1
1.48
Min
0.74

TPR’s Current Ratio of 1.87 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NVR vs. TPR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NVR

0.24

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.87
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

NVR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.24 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TPR

2.79

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.79
Q3
1.32
Median
0.60
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

TPR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.79. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

NVR vs. TPR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NVR

77.14

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

NVR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 77.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TPR

3.53

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
32.83
Median
7.87
Q1
3.52
Min
-32.49

TPR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

NVR vs. TPR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolNVRTPR
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.361.87
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.531.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.242.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)77.143.53

Growth

Revenue Growth

NVR vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NVR vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NVR

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.61%
Q3
3.97%
Median
2.00%
Q1
0.18%
Min
0.00%

NVR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TPR

1.24%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.22%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.34%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Yield of 1.24% is consistent with its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

NVR vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NVR

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
129.55%
Q3
65.55%
Median
42.15%
Q1
6.45%
Min
0.00%

NVR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TPR

35.71%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
94.60%
Median
52.65%
Q1
35.04%
Min
0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.71% is within the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NVR vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolNVRTPR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.24%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%35.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NVR

14.54

Household Durables Industry

Max
33.67
Q3
19.33
Median
12.58
Q1
9.62
Min
6.48

NVR’s P/E Ratio of 14.54 is within the middle range for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TPR

131.71

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
48.15
Q3
33.82
Median
20.70
Q1
14.57
Min
7.12

At 131.71, TPR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

NVR vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NVR

2.06

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.39
Median
0.90
Q1
0.54
Min
0.19

NVR’s P/S Ratio of 2.06 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TPR

3.44

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.35
Q3
3.06
Median
1.66
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

TPR’s P/S Ratio of 3.44 is in the upper echelon for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

NVR vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NVR

5.62

Household Durables Industry

Max
3.26
Q3
2.01
Median
1.38
Q1
1.00
Min
0.58

At 5.62, NVR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TPR

21.26

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.74
Q3
5.59
Median
3.41
Q1
2.01
Min
0.56

At 21.26, TPR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NVR vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolNVRTPR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)14.54131.71
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.063.44
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.6221.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.2822.55