Seek Returns logo

NTAP vs. ZBRA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at NTAP and ZBRA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolNTAPZBRA
Company NameNetApp, Inc.Zebra Technologies Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryTechnology Hardware, Storage & PeripheralsElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization22.44 billion USD16.34 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 21, 1995August 15, 1991
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NTAP and ZBRA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NTAP vs. ZBRA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolNTAPZBRA
5-Day Price Return4.04%4.19%
13-Week Price Return11.72%8.96%
26-Week Price Return-9.91%3.34%
52-Week Price Return-15.37%-7.55%
Month-to-Date Return7.68%-5.19%
Year-to-Date Return-3.40%-16.78%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.10M0.49M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.92M0.55M
3-Month Volatility23.88%36.74%
Beta1.451.78

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NTAP

123.03%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
29.40%
Median
9.11%
Q1
6.06%
Min
-0.79%

NTAP’s Return on Equity of 123.03% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ZBRA

15.38%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

ZBRA’s Return on Equity of 15.38% is on par with the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NTAP vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NTAP

18.05%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.86%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.62%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.21%

NTAP’s Net Profit Margin of 18.05% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ZBRA

10.56%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

ZBRA’s Net Profit Margin of 10.56% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

NTAP vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NTAP

20.34%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.80%
Q3
10.33%
Median
6.31%
Q1
4.86%
Min
2.53%

NTAP’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.34% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

ZBRA

15.30%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

ZBRA’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.30% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NTAP vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolNTAPZBRA
Return on Equity (TTM)123.03%15.38%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.44%6.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.05%10.56%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.34%15.30%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)70.19%48.59%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NTAP

1.26

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
1.98
Median
1.40
Q1
1.26
Min
0.70

NTAP’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ZBRA

1.46

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

ZBRA’s Current Ratio of 1.46 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

NTAP vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NTAP

3.11

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
0.93
Median
0.32
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.11, NTAP operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ZBRA

0.60

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

ZBRA’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

NTAP vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NTAP

17.59

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
204.63
Q3
90.22
Median
21.70
Q1
6.79
Min
-23.93

NTAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.59 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ZBRA

7.83

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

ZBRA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.83 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

NTAP vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolNTAPZBRA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.261.46
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.220.98
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.110.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)17.597.83

Growth

Revenue Growth

NTAP vs. ZBRA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NTAP vs. ZBRA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NTAP

1.96%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.50%
Q3
3.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Yield of 1.96% is consistent with its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ZBRA

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

ZBRA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NTAP vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NTAP

35.75%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
66.07%
Median
42.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.75% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ZBRA

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

ZBRA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NTAP vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolNTAPZBRA
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.96%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)35.75%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NTAP

18.26

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.16
Q3
27.56
Median
17.85
Q1
12.48
Min
6.21

NTAP’s P/E Ratio of 18.26 is within the middle range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ZBRA

30.77

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

ZBRA’s P/E Ratio of 30.77 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NTAP vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NTAP

3.30

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
1.99
Median
0.93
Q1
0.45
Min
0.04

NTAP’s P/S Ratio of 3.30 is in the upper echelon for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ZBRA

3.25

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

ZBRA’s P/S Ratio of 3.25 aligns with the market consensus for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NTAP vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NTAP

17.30

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
12.51
Q3
6.11
Median
1.73
Q1
1.01
Min
0.31

At 17.30, NTAP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ZBRA

4.34

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

ZBRA’s P/B Ratio of 4.34 is in the upper tier for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

NTAP vs. ZBRA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolNTAPZBRA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.2630.77
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.303.25
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)17.304.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.1919.77