Seek Returns logo

NTAP vs. UI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at NTAP and UI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolNTAPUI
Company NameNetApp, Inc.Ubiquiti Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryTechnology Hardware, Storage & PeripheralsCommunications Equipment
Market Capitalization21.69 billion USD23.87 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateNovember 21, 1995October 14, 2011
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NTAP and UI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NTAP vs. UI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolNTAPUI
5-Day Price Return-1.04%-5.42%
13-Week Price Return6.79%-8.17%
26-Week Price Return-7.91%14.88%
52-Week Price Return-17.68%120.33%
Month-to-Date Return4.12%-9.39%
Year-to-Date Return-6.60%18.87%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.63M0.13M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.92M0.11M
3-Month Volatility23.33%46.20%
Beta1.451.40

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NTAP

123.03%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
29.40%
Median
9.11%
Q1
6.06%
Min
-0.79%

NTAP’s Return on Equity of 123.03% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UI

217.64%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.05%
Q3
19.58%
Median
11.77%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-11.93%

UI’s Return on Equity of 217.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

NTAP vs. UI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NTAP

18.05%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.86%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.62%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.21%

NTAP’s Net Profit Margin of 18.05% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

UI

23.64%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
14.32%
Median
5.31%
Q1
1.45%
Min
-12.72%

A Net Profit Margin of 23.64% places UI in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NTAP vs. UI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NTAP

20.34%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.80%
Q3
10.33%
Median
6.31%
Q1
4.86%
Min
2.53%

NTAP’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.34% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

UI

30.71%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
18.90%
Median
6.21%
Q1
2.97%
Min
-20.72%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.71% places UI in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

NTAP vs. UI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolNTAPUI
Return on Equity (TTM)123.03%217.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.44%45.81%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.05%23.64%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.34%30.71%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)70.19%42.16%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NTAP

1.26

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
1.98
Median
1.40
Q1
1.26
Min
0.70

NTAP’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UI

1.39

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
1.72
Median
1.46
Q1
1.18
Min
0.93

UI’s Current Ratio of 1.39 aligns with the median group of the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NTAP vs. UI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NTAP

3.11

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
0.93
Median
0.32
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.11, NTAP operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

UI

0.78

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
0.92
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

UI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NTAP vs. UI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NTAP

17.59

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
204.63
Q3
90.22
Median
21.70
Q1
6.79
Min
-23.93

NTAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.59 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UI

6.64

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
181.73
Q3
113.63
Median
7.59
Q1
3.82
Min
-5.39

UI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

NTAP vs. UI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolNTAPUI
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.261.39
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.220.56
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.110.78
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)17.596.64

Growth

Revenue Growth

NTAP vs. UI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NTAP vs. UI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NTAP

1.96%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.50%
Q3
3.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Yield of 1.96% is consistent with its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UI

0.62%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.88%
Q3
2.75%
Median
0.93%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UI’s Dividend Yield of 0.62% is consistent with its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

NTAP vs. UI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NTAP

35.75%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
66.07%
Median
42.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.75% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UI

26.41%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
55.91%
Median
28.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 26.41% is within the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NTAP vs. UI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolNTAPUI
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.96%0.62%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)35.75%26.41%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NTAP

18.26

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.16
Q3
27.56
Median
17.85
Q1
12.48
Min
6.21

NTAP’s P/E Ratio of 18.26 is within the middle range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UI

42.74

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
57.30
Q3
47.92
Median
27.50
Q1
17.89
Min
13.89

UI’s P/E Ratio of 42.74 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NTAP vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NTAP

3.30

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
1.99
Median
0.93
Q1
0.45
Min
0.04

NTAP’s P/S Ratio of 3.30 is in the upper echelon for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UI

10.11

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.03
Q3
5.53
Median
2.20
Q1
0.99
Min
0.40

UI’s P/S Ratio of 10.11 is in the upper echelon for the Communications Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

NTAP vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NTAP

17.30

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
12.51
Q3
6.11
Median
1.73
Q1
1.01
Min
0.31

At 17.30, NTAP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UI

43.03

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
9.66
Q3
5.60
Median
3.73
Q1
2.67
Min
0.30

At 43.03, UI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NTAP vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolNTAPUI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.2642.74
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.3010.11
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)17.3043.03
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.1932.03