Seek Returns logo

NTAP vs. SMCI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at NTAP and SMCI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolNTAPSMCI
Company NameNetApp, Inc.Super Micro Computer, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryTechnology Hardware, Storage & PeripheralsTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Market Capitalization21.69 billion USD25.43 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 21, 1995March 29, 2007
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NTAP and SMCI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NTAP vs. SMCI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolNTAPSMCI
5-Day Price Return-1.04%-6.33%
13-Week Price Return6.79%-4.87%
26-Week Price Return-7.91%0.78%
52-Week Price Return-17.68%-31.67%
Month-to-Date Return4.12%-27.74%
Year-to-Date Return-6.60%39.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.63M31.08M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.92M43.84M
3-Month Volatility23.33%68.89%
Beta1.451.61

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NTAP

123.03%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
29.40%
Median
9.11%
Q1
6.06%
Min
-0.79%

NTAP’s Return on Equity of 123.03% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SMCI

16.92%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
29.40%
Median
9.11%
Q1
6.06%
Min
-0.79%

SMCI’s Return on Equity of 16.92% is on par with the norm for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NTAP vs. SMCI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NTAP

18.05%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.86%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.62%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.21%

NTAP’s Net Profit Margin of 18.05% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

SMCI

4.77%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.86%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.62%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.21%

SMCI’s Net Profit Margin of 4.77% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

NTAP vs. SMCI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NTAP

20.34%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.80%
Q3
10.33%
Median
6.31%
Q1
4.86%
Min
2.53%

NTAP’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.34% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

SMCI

5.56%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.80%
Q3
10.33%
Median
6.31%
Q1
4.86%
Min
2.53%

SMCI’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.56% is around the midpoint for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NTAP vs. SMCI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolNTAPSMCI
Return on Equity (TTM)123.03%16.92%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.44%9.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.05%4.77%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.34%5.56%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)70.19%11.06%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NTAP

1.26

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
1.98
Median
1.40
Q1
1.26
Min
0.70

NTAP’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SMCI

5.32

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
1.98
Median
1.40
Q1
1.26
Min
0.70

SMCI’s Current Ratio of 5.32 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

NTAP vs. SMCI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NTAP

3.11

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
0.93
Median
0.32
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.11, NTAP operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

SMCI

0.76

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
0.93
Median
0.32
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

SMCI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.76 is typical for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NTAP vs. SMCI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NTAP

17.59

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
204.63
Q3
90.22
Median
21.70
Q1
6.79
Min
-23.93

NTAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.59 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SMCI

21.34

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
204.63
Q3
90.22
Median
21.70
Q1
6.79
Min
-23.93

SMCI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 21.34 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

NTAP vs. SMCI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolNTAPSMCI
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.265.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.223.22
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.110.76
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)17.5921.34

Growth

Revenue Growth

NTAP vs. SMCI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NTAP vs. SMCI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NTAP

1.96%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.50%
Q3
3.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Yield of 1.96% is consistent with its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SMCI

0.00%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.50%
Q3
3.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SMCI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NTAP vs. SMCI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NTAP

35.75%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
66.07%
Median
42.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.75% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SMCI

0.00%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
66.07%
Median
42.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SMCI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NTAP vs. SMCI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolNTAPSMCI
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.96%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)35.75%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NTAP

18.26

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.16
Q3
27.56
Median
17.85
Q1
12.48
Min
6.21

NTAP’s P/E Ratio of 18.26 is within the middle range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SMCI

24.29

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.16
Q3
27.56
Median
17.85
Q1
12.48
Min
6.21

SMCI’s P/E Ratio of 24.29 is within the middle range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NTAP vs. SMCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NTAP

3.30

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
1.99
Median
0.93
Q1
0.45
Min
0.04

NTAP’s P/S Ratio of 3.30 is in the upper echelon for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SMCI

1.16

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
1.99
Median
0.93
Q1
0.45
Min
0.04

SMCI’s P/S Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the market consensus for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NTAP vs. SMCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NTAP

17.30

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
12.51
Q3
6.11
Median
1.73
Q1
1.01
Min
0.31

At 17.30, NTAP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SMCI

4.64

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
12.51
Q3
6.11
Median
1.73
Q1
1.01
Min
0.31

SMCI’s P/B Ratio of 4.64 is within the conventional range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NTAP vs. SMCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolNTAPSMCI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.2624.29
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.301.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)17.304.64
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.1914.15