Seek Returns logo

MTD vs. TAK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MTD and TAK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MTD is a standard domestic listing, while TAK trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolMTDTAK
Company NameMettler-Toledo International Inc.Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
CountryUnited StatesJapan
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryLife Sciences Tools & ServicesPharmaceuticals
Market Capitalization27.22 billion USD49.02 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 14, 1997January 5, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MTD and TAK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MTD vs. TAK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMTDTAK
5-Day Price Return0.77%2.30%
13-Week Price Return16.61%10.63%
26-Week Price Return3.79%9.73%
52-Week Price Return-7.71%5.51%
Month-to-Date Return7.11%9.26%
Year-to-Date Return7.99%9.76%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.14M4.69M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.18M4.19M
3-Month Volatility29.82%14.84%
Beta1.410.36

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MTD

1,675.84%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.55%
Median
6.22%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

MTD’s Return on Equity of 1,675.84% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TAK

1.48%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.90%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.96%

TAK’s Return on Equity of 1.48% is in the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

MTD vs. TAK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MTD

21.46%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
27.28%
Q3
16.17%
Median
7.24%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-3.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.46% places MTD in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TAK

2.36%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
34.51%
Q3
17.73%
Median
12.12%
Q1
5.99%
Min
-7.73%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, TAK’s Net Profit Margin of 2.36% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MTD vs. TAK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MTD

26.49%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
33.15%
Q3
19.34%
Median
13.02%
Q1
8.05%
Min
-4.38%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.49% places MTD in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TAK

7.48%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
41.53%
Q3
23.00%
Median
16.24%
Q1
9.24%
Min
-6.94%

TAK’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.48% is in the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MTD vs. TAK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMTDTAK
Return on Equity (TTM)1,675.84%1.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)25.15%0.72%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.46%2.36%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.49%7.48%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.94%65.51%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MTD

1.12

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.77
Median
1.85
Q1
1.40
Min
0.43

MTD’s Current Ratio of 1.12 falls into the lower quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TAK

1.01

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.77
Median
1.74
Q1
1.26
Min
0.11

TAK’s Current Ratio of 1.01 falls into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MTD vs. TAK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MTD

81.23

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.83
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 81.23, MTD operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

TAK

0.65

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
2.44
Q3
1.07
Median
0.42
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

TAK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 is typical for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MTD vs. TAK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MTD

15.60

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
29.61
Q3
23.24
Median
6.07
Q1
2.18
Min
-14.08

MTD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.60 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TAK

2.05

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
44.18
Median
9.83
Q1
2.82
Min
-42.71

In the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, TAK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.05 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

MTD vs. TAK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMTDTAK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.121.01
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.670.52
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)81.230.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.602.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

MTD vs. TAK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MTD vs. TAK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MTD

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.80%
Q3
0.78%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MTD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TAK

4.23%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
6.98%
Q3
3.32%
Median
2.13%
Q1
0.14%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.23%, TAK offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MTD vs. TAK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MTD

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
156.00%
Q3
65.73%
Median
23.81%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MTD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TAK

138.69%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
165.20%
Q3
90.59%
Median
49.13%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

TAK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 138.69% is in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MTD vs. TAK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMTDTAK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%4.23%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%138.69%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MTD

32.53

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
117.96
Q3
65.59
Median
37.26
Q1
27.51
Min
1.73

MTD’s P/E Ratio of 32.53 is within the middle range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TAK

66.26

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
42.51
Q3
26.88
Median
19.11
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

At 66.26, TAK’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MTD vs. TAK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MTD

6.98

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
12.46
Q3
6.70
Median
4.24
Q1
2.68
Min
0.73

MTD’s P/S Ratio of 6.98 is in the upper echelon for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TAK

1.56

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.54
Median
2.11
Q1
1.52
Min
0.00

TAK’s P/S Ratio of 1.56 aligns with the market consensus for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MTD vs. TAK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MTD

1,299.40

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
7.99
Q3
4.69
Median
3.30
Q1
1.88
Min
1.02

At 1,299.40, MTD’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TAK

1.01

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.96
Median
2.23
Q1
1.46
Min
0.60

TAK’s P/B Ratio of 1.01 is in the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MTD vs. TAK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMTDTAK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)32.5366.26
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.981.56
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1,299.401.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)31.8410.08