MTB vs. RF: M&T Bank vs. Regions Financial Stock Comparison
How do M&T Bank (MTB) and Regions Financial (RF) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
M&T Bank (MTB) and Regions Financial (RF) are both classified in the Regional Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | MTB | RF |
|---|---|---|
| Name | M&T Bank Corporation | Regions Financial Corp. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Banks | Banks |
| GICS Industry | Banks | Banks |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Regional Banks | Regional Banks |
| Market Capitalization | 31.23 billion USD | 24.06 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | MTB | RF |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 24.05% | 22.28% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 27.97% | 30.40% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 11.15% | 8.09% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | MTB | RF |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 21.48% | 23.37% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.63 | 1.00 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -40.71% | -40.99% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 979.16K | 9.26M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | MTB | RF |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.92 | 0.77 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.36 | 1.11 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both M&T Bank (MTB) at 10.60% and Regions Financial (RF) at 12.38% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
MTB
Banks industry group
10.60%
- Max
- 19.84%
- Q3
- 13.67%
- Median
- 11.49%
- MTB
- 10.60%
- Q1
- 9.50%
- Min
- 3.64%
RF
Banks industry group
12.38%
- Max
- 19.84%
- Q3
- 13.67%
- RF
- 12.38%
- Median
- 11.49%
- Q1
- 9.50%
- Min
- 3.64%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both M&T Bank (MTB) at 31.87% and Regions Financial (RF) at 31.29% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
MTB
Banks industry group
31.87%
- Max
- 47.19%
- Q3
- 35.25%
- MTB
- 31.87%
- Median
- 31.21%
- Q1
- 27.11%
- Min
- 14.93%
RF
Banks industry group
31.29%
- Max
- 47.19%
- Q3
- 35.25%
- RF
- 31.29%
- Median
- 31.21%
- Q1
- 27.11%
- Min
- 14.93%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for M&T Bank (MTB) in Banks and Regions Financial (RF) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | MTB | RF |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 10.60% | 12.38% |
| ROA (TTM) | 1.40% | 1.42% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 31.87% | 31.29% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Regions Financial (RF) at 6.25% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while M&T Bank (MTB) at 4.34% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both M&T Bank (MTB) at 16.12% and Regions Financial (RF) at 19.17% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | MTB | RF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 4.34% | 6.25% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 6.33% | 1.65% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 16.12% | 19.17% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 13.82% | 0.29% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: M&T Bank (MTB) in Banks and Regions Financial (RF) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: M&T Bank (MTB) in Banks and Regions Financial (RF) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | MTB | RF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Regions Financial (RF) at 3.85% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while M&T Bank (MTB) at 2.73% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, RF the richer one.
MTB
Banks industry group
2.73%
- Max
- 5.79%
- Q3
- 3.18%
- MTB
- 2.73%
- Median
- 2.39%
- Q1
- 1.20%
- Min
- 0.00%
RF
Banks industry group
3.85%
- Max
- 5.79%
- RF
- 3.85%
- Q3
- 3.18%
- Median
- 2.39%
- Q1
- 1.20%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
M&T Bank (MTB) at 31.35% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Regions Financial (RF) at 43.27% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
MTB
Banks industry group
31.35%
- Max
- 70.75%
- Q3
- 41.28%
- MTB
- 31.35%
- Median
- 29.26%
- Q1
- 18.98%
- Min
- 0.00%
RF
Banks industry group
43.27%
- Max
- 70.75%
- RF
- 43.27%
- Q3
- 41.28%
- Median
- 29.26%
- Q1
- 18.98%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | MTB | RF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.73% | 3.85% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 31.35% | 43.27% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both M&T Bank (MTB) at 11.38 and Regions Financial (RF) at 11.10 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
MTB
Banks industry group
11.38
- Max
- 18.16
- Q3
- 13.75
- Median
- 11.81
- MTB
- 11.38
- Q1
- 10.64
- Min
- 6.49
RF
Banks industry group
11.10
- Max
- 18.16
- Q3
- 13.75
- Median
- 11.81
- RF
- 11.10
- Q1
- 10.64
- Min
- 6.49
P/S Ratio (TTM)
P/S ratio is set aside for both M&T Bank (MTB) in Banks and Regions Financial (RF) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both M&T Bank (MTB) at 1.24 and Regions Financial (RF) at 1.46 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
MTB
Banks industry group
1.24
- Max
- 2.28
- Q3
- 1.58
- Median
- 1.32
- MTB
- 1.24
- Q1
- 1.10
- Min
- 0.59
RF
Banks industry group
1.46
- Max
- 2.28
- Q3
- 1.58
- RF
- 1.46
- Median
- 1.32
- Q1
- 1.10
- Min
- 0.59
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | MTB | RF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 11.38 | 11.10 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | -- | -- |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.24 | 1.46 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |