MTB vs. PNFP: M&T Bank vs. Pinnacle Financial Partners Stock Comparison

Company Profile

M&T Bank (MTB) and Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) are both classified in the Regional Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both M&T Bank (MTB) at 10.60% and Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) at 9.56% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

M&T Bank (MTB) at 31.87% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) at 25.54% retains only a bottom-quartile share.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for M&T Bank (MTB) in Banks and Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) at 17.76% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while M&T Bank (MTB) at 4.34% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) at 35.40% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while M&T Bank (MTB) at 16.12% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for PNFP.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: M&T Bank (MTB) in Banks and Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: M&T Bank (MTB) in Banks and Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both M&T Bank (MTB) at 2.73% and Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) at 1.72% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

Both M&T Bank (MTB) at 31.35% and Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) at 23.29% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both M&T Bank (MTB) at 11.38 and Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) at 13.47 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

P/S ratio is set aside for both M&T Bank (MTB) in Banks and Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) at 1.10 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while M&T Bank (MTB) at 1.24 is valued near its industry’s middle — PNFP is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

Valuation Metrics