Seek Returns

MSFT vs. NVDA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Here’s a clear look at MSFT and NVDA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMSFTNVDA
Company NameMicrosoft CorporationNVIDIA Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS Industry GroupSoftware & ServicesSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
GICS IndustrySoftwareSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
GICS Sub-IndustrySystems SoftwareSemiconductors
Market Capitalization3,125.66 billion USD5,140.51 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 13, 1986January 22, 1999
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

NVDA’s market capitalization (5,140.51 billion USD) is significantly greater than MSFT’s (3,125.66 billion USD), highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MSFT and NVDA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MSFT
NVDA
Loading price history…
MSFT vs. NVDA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMSFTNVDA
5-Day Price Return1.53%6.58%
13-Week Price Return1.59%21.42%
26-Week Price Return-19.97%4.24%
52-Week Price Return-2.90%80.68%
Month-to-Date Return3.19%5.98%
Year-to-Date Return-13.00%13.40%
10-Day Avg. Volume34.83M165.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume34.85M169.51M
3-Month Volatility29.03%39.34%
Beta1.092.26

NVDA carries a higher beta at 2.26, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while MSFT (beta: 1.09) exhibits greater stability.

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MSFT

33.13%

Software Industry
Max
66.41%
Q3
25.18%
Median
10.29%
Q1
-3.47%
Min
-39.77%

In the upper quartile for the Software industry, MSFT’s Return on Equity of 33.13% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

NVDA

104.37%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
48.79%
Q3
19.97%
Median
7.89%
Q1
0.23%
Min
-28.42%

NVDA’s Return on Equity of 104.37% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MSFT vs. NVDA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MSFT

39.34%

Software Industry
Max
46.40%
Q3
19.46%
Median
11.78%
Q1
-2.46%
Min
-35.22%

A Net Profit Margin of 39.34% places MSFT in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NVDA

55.60%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
55.60%
Q3
23.51%
Median
10.31%
Q1
-0.69%
Min
-34.23%

A Net Profit Margin of 55.60% places NVDA in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MSFT vs. NVDA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MSFT

46.75%

Software Industry
Max
49.62%
Q3
25.22%
Median
13.11%
Q1
-3.59%
Min
-43.76%

An Operating Profit Margin of 46.75% places MSFT in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

NVDA

60.38%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
60.38%
Q3
27.09%
Median
12.40%
Q1
2.30%
Min
-25.47%

An Operating Profit Margin of 60.38% places NVDA in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MSFT vs. NVDA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMSFTNVDA
Return on Equity (TTM)33.13%104.37%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.15%75.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)39.34%55.60%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)46.75%60.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)68.31%71.31%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MSFT

1.28

Software Industry
Max
3.83
Q3
2.25
Median
1.55
Q1
1.03
Min
0.08

MSFT’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NVDA

3.91

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
7.65
Q3
4.58
Median
2.90
Q1
2.27
Min
1.23

NVDA’s Current Ratio of 3.91 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MSFT vs. NVDA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MSFT

0.25

Software Industry
Max
2.70
Q3
1.08
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

MSFT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.25 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NVDA

0.05

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
1.34
Q3
0.57
Median
0.24
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

NVDA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.05 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MSFT vs. NVDA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MSFT

891.80

Software Industry
Max
45.58
Q3
17.44
Median
2.12
Q1
-7.25
Min
-36.57

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 891.80, MSFT demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

NVDA

75.66

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
135.68
Q3
58.79
Median
14.73
Q1
2.53
Min
-37.06

NVDA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 75.66 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MSFT vs. NVDA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMSFTNVDA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.283.91
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.273.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.250.05
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)891.8075.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

MSFT vs. NVDA: A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolMSFTNVDA
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)18.30%73.21%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)17.87%65.47%
3-Year Revenue CAGR12.42%100.05%
5-Year Revenue CAGR14.52%66.90%

EPS Growth

MSFT vs. NVDA: A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolMSFTNVDA
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)23.32%96.66%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)29.75%66.76%
3-Year EPS CAGR12.24%204.08%
5-Year EPS CAGR18.80%95.27%

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MSFT

0.82%

Software Industry
Max
1.03%
Q3
0.45%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.82%, MSFT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Software industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

NVDA

0.02%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
1.98%
Q3
0.81%
Median
0.27%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NVDA’s Dividend Yield of 0.02% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MSFT vs. NVDA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MSFT

20.65%

Software Industry
Max
35.09%
Q3
16.21%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MSFT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.65% is in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

NVDA

0.81%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
168.19%
Q3
72.81%
Median
22.20%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NVDA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.81% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MSFT vs. NVDA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMSFTNVDA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.82%0.02%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)20.65%0.81%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MSFT

25.23

Software Industry
Max
126.48
Q3
63.72
Median
31.64
Q1
20.28
Min
9.61

MSFT’s P/E Ratio of 25.23 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NVDA

43.19

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
181.91
Q3
100.05
Median
57.82
Q1
38.78
Min
13.96

NVDA’s P/E Ratio of 43.19 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MSFT vs. NVDA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MSFT

9.93

Software Industry
Max
16.39
Q3
8.88
Median
5.32
Q1
3.29
Min
0.90

MSFT’s P/S Ratio of 9.93 is in the upper echelon for the Software industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

NVDA

24.02

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
31.49
Q3
15.35
Median
8.59
Q1
4.32
Min
1.15

NVDA’s P/S Ratio of 24.02 is in the upper echelon for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MSFT vs. NVDA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MSFT

6.63

Software Industry
Max
25.50
Q3
12.25
Median
6.58
Q1
3.34
Min
0.38

MSFT’s P/B Ratio of 6.63 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NVDA

28.81

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
15.44
Q3
8.26
Median
3.95
Q1
1.89
Min
0.78

At 28.81, NVDA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MSFT vs. NVDA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMSFTNVDA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)25.2343.19
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.9324.02
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.6328.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)43.3353.64