Seek Returns logo

MRVL vs. MSTR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MRVL and MSTR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

MSTR’s market capitalization of 110.45 billion USD is significantly greater than MRVL’s 64.82 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

MSTR carries a higher beta at 3.76, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while MRVL (beta: 1.76) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolMRVLMSTR
Company NameMarvell Technology, Inc.MicroStrategy Incorporated
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsSoftware - Application
CEOMatthew J. MurphyPhong Q. Le
Price75.18 USD403.99 USD
Market Cap64.82 billion USD110.45 billion USD
Beta1.763.76
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateJune 30, 2000June 11, 1998
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MRVL and MSTR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MRVL vs. MSTR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

MRVL

-3.62%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

MRVL has a negative Return on Equity of -3.62%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MSTR

-81.73%

Software - Application Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
17.85%
Median
4.73%
Q1
-10.56%
Min
-52.94%

MSTR has a negative Return on Equity of -81.73%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MRVL vs. MSTR: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

MRVL

0.22%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

MRVL’s Return on Invested Capital of 0.22% is in line with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

MSTR

-12.06%

Software - Application Industry

Max
35.07%
Q3
9.72%
Median
0.76%
Q1
-8.68%
Min
-34.12%

MSTR has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -12.06%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

MRVL vs. MSTR: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

MRVL

-7.56%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

MRVL has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7.56%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MSTR

-1,163.04%

Software - Application Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
16.07%
Median
1.83%
Q1
-9.60%
Min
-45.64%

MSTR has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1,163.04%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MRVL vs. MSTR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

MRVL

0.62%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

MRVL’s Operating Profit Margin of 0.62% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MSTR

-1,648.40%

Software - Application Industry

Max
51.67%
Q3
15.35%
Median
1.79%
Q1
-12.42%
Min
-45.17%

MSTR has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -1,648.40%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MRVL vs. MSTR: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMRVLMSTR
Return on Equity (TTM)-3.62%-81.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)-2.45%-12.16%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)0.22%-12.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-7.56%-1163.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)0.62%-1648.40%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)43.17%70.95%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

MRVL

1.30

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

MRVL’s Current Ratio of 1.30 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MSTR

0.66

Software - Application Industry

Max
5.09
Q3
2.84
Median
1.70
Q1
1.12
Min
0.04

MSTR’s Current Ratio of 0.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Software - Application industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MRVL vs. MSTR: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

MRVL

0.34

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

MRVL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.34 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MSTR

0.08

Software - Application Industry

Max
1.85
Q3
0.77
Median
0.18
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

MSTR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 is typical for the Software - Application industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MRVL vs. MSTR: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

MRVL

0.21

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

MRVL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.21 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

MSTR

-229.74

Software - Application Industry

Max
39.23
Q3
8.55
Median
1.48
Q1
-14.59
Min
-39.97

MSTR has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -229.74. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MRVL vs. MSTR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMRVLMSTR
Current Ratio (TTM)1.300.66
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.940.66
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.340.08
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.230.00
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)3.43-0.01
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.21-229.74

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for MRVL and MSTR. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

MRVL vs. MSTR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

MRVL vs. MSTR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

MRVL vs. MSTR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

MRVL

0.32%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MRVL’s Dividend Yield of 0.32% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MSTR

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
3.66%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MSTR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MRVL vs. MSTR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

MRVL

-42.22%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MRVL has a negative Dividend Payout Ratio of -42.22%. This typically means the company paid a dividend despite reporting a net loss, a situation that may signal financial instability.

MSTR

0.00%

Software - Application Industry

Max
81.09%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MSTR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MRVL vs. MSTR: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMRVLMSTR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.32%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)-42.22%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

MRVL

-132.28

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

MRVL has a negative P/E Ratio of -132.28. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

MSTR

-19.40

Software - Application Industry

Max
194.31
Q3
98.56
Median
51.87
Q1
22.76
Min
1.02

MSTR has a negative P/E Ratio of -19.40. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

MRVL vs. MSTR: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

MRVL

-8.72

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

MSTR

0.07

Software - Application Industry

Max
15.44
Q3
6.57
Median
2.78
Q1
0.55
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Software - Application industry, MSTR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.07 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

MRVL vs. MSTR: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

MRVL

9.97

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

MRVL’s P/S Ratio of 9.97 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MSTR

240.49

Software - Application Industry

Max
23.49
Q3
11.14
Median
5.62
Q1
2.84
Min
0.33

With a P/S Ratio of 240.49, MSTR trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Software - Application industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MRVL vs. MSTR: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

MRVL

4.88

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

MRVL’s P/B Ratio of 4.88 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MSTR

79.43

Software - Application Industry

Max
21.03
Q3
10.49
Median
6.36
Q1
2.89
Min
0.12

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Application industry.

MRVL vs. MSTR: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Application industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMRVLMSTR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-132.28-19.40
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-8.720.07
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)9.97240.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.8879.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)47.25-5.38
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)64.72-14.59
EV-to-Sales (TTM)10.53240.60