MPC vs. TS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 27, 2025

Here’s a clear look at MPC and TS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MPC is a standard domestic listing, while TS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	MPC	TS
Company Name	Marathon Petroleum Corporation	Tenaris S.A.
Country	United States	Luxembourg
GICS Sector	Energy	Energy
GICS Industry	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels	Energy Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization	52.35 billion USD	18.96 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	June 24, 2011	December 16, 2002
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MPC and TS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MPC vs. TS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	MPC	TS
5-Day Price Return	4.75%	1.82%
13-Week Price Return	8.36%	9.21%
26-Week Price Return	9.92%	-16.60%
52-Week Price Return	0.23%	23.82%
Month-to-Date Return	1.17%	1.33%
Year-to-Date Return	23.43%	-13.42%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.73M	1.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.31M	2.01M
3-Month Volatility	24.08%	26.07%
Beta	0.89	0.74

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MPC

13.09%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 35.51%
Q3: 17.86%
Median: 10.69%
Q1: 5.71%
Min: -8.98%

MPC’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TS

11.86%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max: 35.03%
Q3: 20.76%
Median: 14.62%
Q1: 7.78%
Min: -6.65%

TS’s Return on Equity of 11.86% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MPC vs. TS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MPC

1.58%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 44.03%
Q3: 20.12%
Median: 8.91%
Q1: 2.62%
Min: -23.39%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, MPC’s Net Profit Margin of 1.58% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TS

17.02%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max: 16.78%
Q3: 10.68%
Median: 6.39%
Q1: 3.11%
Min: 1.00%

TS’s Net Profit Margin of 17.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

MPC vs. TS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MPC

3.99%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 64.72%
Q3: 31.93%
Median: 19.14%
Q1: 5.67%
Min: -27.31%

MPC’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.99% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TS

18.93%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max: 30.90%
Q3: 17.97%
Median: 10.83%
Q1: 5.79%
Min: -5.29%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.93% places TS in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MPC vs. TS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	MPC	TS
Return on Equity (TTM)	13.09%	11.86%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.99%	9.70%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	1.58%	17.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	3.99%	18.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	9.41%	33.79%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MPC

1.19

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 2.76
Q3: 1.64
Median: 1.22
Q1: 0.84
Min: 0.22

MPC’s Current Ratio of 1.19 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TS

3.41

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max: 3.39
Q3: 2.12
Median: 1.44
Q1: 1.11
Min: 0.64

TS’s Current Ratio of 3.41 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

MPC vs. TS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MPC

1.89

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 2.24
Q3: 1.06
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.24
Min: 0.00

MPC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.89. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TS

0.03

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max: 1.70
Q3: 0.97
Median: 0.47
Q1: 0.35
Min: 0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, TS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MPC vs. TS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MPC

8.08

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 54.03
Q3: 23.32
Median: 7.46
Q1: 2.57
Min: -19.25

MPC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TS

101.80

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max: 49.88
Q3: 25.59
Median: 7.66
Q1: 2.90
Min: -17.36

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 101.80, TS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

MPC vs. TS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	MPC	TS
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.19	3.41
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.73	2.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	1.89	0.03
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	8.08	101.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

MPC vs. TS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MPC vs. TS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MPC

2.26%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 13.98%
Q3: 7.41%
Median: 4.36%
Q1: 2.84%
Min: 0.00%

MPC’s Dividend Yield of 2.26% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

TS

4.64%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max: 6.99%
Q3: 3.07%
Median: 2.19%
Q1: 0.38%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.64%, TS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MPC vs. TS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MPC

38.21%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 180.73%
Q3: 92.90%
Median: 63.90%
Q1: 27.41%
Min: 0.00%

MPC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.21% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TS

85.87%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max: 200.86%
Q3: 147.58%
Median: 28.52%
Q1: 15.22%
Min: 0.00%

TS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.87% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MPC vs. TS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	MPC	TS
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.26%	4.64%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	38.21%	85.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MPC

23.41

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 41.71
Q3: 21.35
Median: 12.26
Q1: 7.77
Min: 0.00

A P/E Ratio of 23.41 places MPC in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TS

9.69

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max: 30.60
Q3: 21.14
Median: 12.35
Q1: 10.72
Min: 5.76

In the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, TS’s P/E Ratio of 9.69 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MPC vs. TS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MPC

0.37

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 5.87
Q3: 2.89
Median: 1.29
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.00

In the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, MPC’s P/S Ratio of 0.37 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TS

1.65

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max: 2.20
Q3: 1.58
Median: 0.85
Q1: 0.55
Min: 0.23

TS’s P/S Ratio of 1.65 is in the upper echelon for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MPC vs. TS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MPC

2.77

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max: 3.83
Q3: 2.12
Median: 1.34
Q1: 0.91
Min: 0.34

MPC’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TS

1.20

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max: 3.73
Q3: 2.43
Median: 1.82
Q1: 1.18
Min: 0.27

TS’s P/B Ratio of 1.20 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MPC vs. TS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	MPC	TS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	23.41	9.69
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.37	1.65
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	2.77	1.20
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	11.43	10.42