Seek Returns logo

MO vs. STZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MO and STZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMOSTZ
Company NameAltria Group, Inc.Constellation Brands, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryTobaccoBeverages
Market Capitalization113.68 billion USD29.55 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962March 17, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MO and STZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MO vs. STZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMOSTZ
5-Day Price Return2.55%0.82%
13-Week Price Return13.83%-9.74%
26-Week Price Return28.28%-1.04%
52-Week Price Return30.61%-31.51%
Month-to-Date Return9.25%0.35%
Year-to-Date Return29.41%-24.15%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.63M1.65M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.60M1.98M
3-Month Volatility17.61%26.85%
Beta0.600.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MO

149.65%

Tobacco Industry

Max
49.48%
Q3
49.48%
Median
7.92%
Q1
5.28%
Min
4.04%

MO’s Return on Equity of 149.65% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

STZ

-5.93%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

STZ has a negative Return on Equity of -5.93%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MO vs. STZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MO

37.24%

Tobacco Industry

Max
21.36%
Q3
18.49%
Median
11.05%
Q1
6.80%
Min
5.37%

MO’s Net Profit Margin of 37.24% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

STZ

-4.40%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

STZ has a negative Net Profit Margin of -4.40%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MO vs. STZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MO

46.84%

Tobacco Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
12.68%
Median
11.00%
Q1
10.58%
Min
10.58%

MO’s Operating Profit Margin of 46.84% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

STZ

1.24%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

STZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.24% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MO vs. STZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMOSTZ
Return on Equity (TTM)149.65%-5.93%
Return on Assets (TTM)25.57%-1.97%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)37.24%-4.40%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)46.84%1.24%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)61.41%51.67%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MO

0.39

Tobacco Industry

Max
3.20
Q3
1.83
Median
0.83
Q1
0.72
Min
0.57

MO’s Current Ratio of 0.39 is notably low, falling beneath the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This suggests a heightened liquidity risk and could indicate potential challenges in meeting its short-term obligations.

STZ

1.07

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

STZ’s Current Ratio of 1.07 aligns with the median group of the Beverages industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MO vs. STZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Tobacco and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MO

8.67

Tobacco Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
2.19
Median
0.74
Q1
0.26
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.67, MO operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Tobacco industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

STZ

1.59

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

STZ’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Beverages industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.59. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MO vs. STZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Tobacco and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MO

36.48

Tobacco Industry

Max
36.48
Q3
28.54
Median
7.02
Q1
6.32
Min
-11.45

MO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 36.48 is in the upper quartile for the Tobacco industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

STZ

0.81

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

STZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.81 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

MO vs. STZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMOSTZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.391.07
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.240.51
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)8.671.59
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)36.480.81

Growth

Revenue Growth

MO vs. STZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MO vs. STZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MO

6.07%

Tobacco Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
6.06%
Median
5.48%
Q1
3.91%
Min
3.27%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.07%, MO offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Tobacco industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

STZ

2.46%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

STZ’s Dividend Yield of 2.46% is consistent with its peers in the Beverages industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MO vs. STZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MO

78.29%

Tobacco Industry

Max
77.64%
Q3
76.55%
Median
50.14%
Q1
47.08%
Min
42.39%

At 78.29%, MO’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Tobacco industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

STZ

32.23%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

STZ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.23% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

MO vs. STZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMOSTZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)6.07%2.46%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)78.29%32.23%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MO

12.90

Tobacco Industry

Max
42.16
Q3
36.45
Median
20.93
Q1
10.52
Min
9.15

MO’s P/E Ratio of 12.90 is within the middle range for the Tobacco industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

STZ

--

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

P/E Ratio data for STZ is currently unavailable.

MO vs. STZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MO

4.80

Tobacco Industry

Max
10.48
Q3
5.39
Median
3.32
Q1
1.54
Min
0.59

MO’s P/S Ratio of 4.80 aligns with the market consensus for the Tobacco industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

STZ

2.94

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

STZ’s P/S Ratio of 2.94 is in the upper echelon for the Beverages industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MO vs. STZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MO

27.09

Tobacco Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
4.76
Median
2.18
Q1
1.70
Min
1.06

At 27.09, MO’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Tobacco industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

STZ

4.24

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

STZ’s P/B Ratio of 4.24 is in the upper tier for the Beverages industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MO vs. STZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Tobacco and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMOSTZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.90--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.802.94
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)27.094.24
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.9814.31