Seek Returns logo

MNST vs. STZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MNST and STZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMNSTSTZ
Company NameMonster Beverage CorporationConstellation Brands, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryBeveragesBeverages
Market Capitalization70.79 billion USD23.13 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateDecember 9, 1985March 17, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MNST and STZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MNST vs. STZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMNSTSTZ
5-Day Price Return1.83%-0.64%
13-Week Price Return10.32%-21.23%
26-Week Price Return18.40%-29.88%
52-Week Price Return26.48%-45.88%
Month-to-Date Return6.70%-0.32%
Year-to-Date Return35.67%-40.74%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.10M2.36M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.67M2.49M
3-Month Volatility23.24%26.66%
Beta0.460.45

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MNST

25.20%

Beverages Industry

Max
47.01%
Q3
22.97%
Median
10.24%
Q1
6.33%
Min
-16.74%

In the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, MNST’s Return on Equity of 25.20% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

STZ

16.60%

Beverages Industry

Max
47.01%
Q3
22.97%
Median
10.24%
Q1
6.33%
Min
-16.74%

STZ’s Return on Equity of 16.60% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MNST vs. STZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MNST

21.65%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.65%
Q3
12.41%
Median
8.66%
Q1
5.10%
Min
-5.72%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.65% places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

STZ

12.70%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.65%
Q3
12.41%
Median
8.66%
Q1
5.10%
Min
-5.72%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.70% places STZ in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MNST vs. STZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MNST

28.31%

Beverages Industry

Max
31.42%
Q3
20.65%
Median
13.47%
Q1
9.66%
Min
2.33%

An Operating Profit Margin of 28.31% places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

STZ

23.18%

Beverages Industry

Max
31.42%
Q3
20.65%
Median
13.47%
Q1
9.66%
Min
2.33%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.18% places STZ in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MNST vs. STZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMNSTSTZ
Return on Equity (TTM)25.20%16.60%
Return on Assets (TTM)20.15%5.55%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.65%12.70%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)28.31%23.18%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)55.81%51.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MNST

3.19

Beverages Industry

Max
3.43
Q3
1.91
Median
1.22
Q1
0.83
Min
0.55

MNST’s Current Ratio of 3.19 is in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

STZ

1.08

Beverages Industry

Max
3.43
Q3
1.91
Median
1.22
Q1
0.83
Min
0.55

STZ’s Current Ratio of 1.08 aligns with the median group of the Beverages industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MNST vs. STZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MNST

0.00

Beverages Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.09
Median
0.73
Q1
0.35
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, MNST’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

STZ

1.41

Beverages Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.09
Median
0.73
Q1
0.35
Min
0.00

STZ’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Beverages industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.41. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MNST vs. STZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MNST

123.81

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
42.68
Median
10.96
Q1
3.86
Min
0.81

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 123.81, MNST demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Beverages industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

STZ

0.81

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
42.68
Median
10.96
Q1
3.86
Min
0.81

STZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.81 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

MNST vs. STZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMNSTSTZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.191.08
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.630.28
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.001.41
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)123.810.81

Growth

Revenue Growth

MNST vs. STZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MNST vs. STZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MNST

0.00%

Beverages Industry

Max
7.61%
Q3
4.81%
Median
3.32%
Q1
2.18%
Min
0.00%

MNST currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

STZ

3.22%

Beverages Industry

Max
7.61%
Q3
4.81%
Median
3.32%
Q1
2.18%
Min
0.00%

STZ’s Dividend Yield of 3.22% is consistent with its peers in the Beverages industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MNST vs. STZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MNST

0.00%

Beverages Industry

Max
193.57%
Q3
102.38%
Median
72.98%
Q1
39.04%
Min
0.00%

MNST has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

STZ

34.03%

Beverages Industry

Max
193.57%
Q3
102.38%
Median
72.98%
Q1
39.04%
Min
0.00%

STZ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 34.03% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

MNST vs. STZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMNSTSTZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.22%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%34.03%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MNST

40.34

Beverages Industry

Max
36.07
Q3
23.27
Median
18.39
Q1
14.57
Min
6.38

At 40.34, MNST’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Beverages industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

STZ

18.39

Beverages Industry

Max
36.07
Q3
23.27
Median
18.39
Q1
14.57
Min
6.38

STZ’s P/E Ratio of 18.39 is within the middle range for the Beverages industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MNST vs. STZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MNST

8.74

Beverages Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.29
Median
1.56
Q1
0.91
Min
0.38

With a P/S Ratio of 8.74, MNST trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Beverages industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

STZ

2.34

Beverages Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.29
Median
1.56
Q1
0.91
Min
0.38

STZ’s P/S Ratio of 2.34 is in the upper echelon for the Beverages industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MNST vs. STZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MNST

8.49

Beverages Industry

Max
7.45
Q3
4.03
Median
2.20
Q1
1.39
Min
0.83

At 8.49, MNST’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Beverages industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

STZ

3.81

Beverages Industry

Max
7.45
Q3
4.03
Median
2.20
Q1
1.39
Min
0.83

STZ’s P/B Ratio of 3.81 is within the conventional range for the Beverages industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MNST vs. STZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMNSTSTZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)40.3418.39
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.742.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.493.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)35.1012.17