MNST vs. STZ: Monster Beverage vs. Constellation Brands Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Monster Beverage (MNST) and Constellation Brands (STZ) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Monster Beverage (MNST) and Constellation Brands (STZ) both belong to the Beverages industry, though MNST is classified under Soft Drinks & Non-alcoholic Beverages while STZ falls under Distillers & Vintners.

Company profile comparison for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Constellation Brands (STZ)
Profile Item	MNST	STZ
Name	Monster Beverage Corporation	Constellation Brands Inc. Class A
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Consumer Staples	Consumer Staples
GICS Industry Group	Food, Beverage & Tobacco	Food, Beverage & Tobacco
GICS Industry	Beverages	Beverages
GICS Sub-Industry	Soft Drinks & Non-alcoholic Beverages	Distillers & Vintners
Market Capitalization	89.50 billion USD	24.02 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	Nasdaq	NYSE
Listing Date	December 9, 1985	March 17, 1992
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

MNST

STZ

GSPC

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Constellation Brands (STZ). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Constellation Brands (STZ). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Constellation Brands (STZ)
Metric	MNST	STZ
Total Return (1Y)	29.93%	17.39%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	18.04%	-13.22%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	14.58%	-6.25%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

MNST

STZ

GSPC

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Constellation Brands (STZ). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Constellation Brands (STZ)
Metric	MNST	STZ
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	26.79%	32.11%
Beta (5Y)	0.52	0.37
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-26.03%	-56.05%
Avg. Volume (3M)	9.80M	2.28M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

MNST and STZ are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Constellation Brands (STZ)
Metric	MNST	STZ
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.96	0.41
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	1.54	0.61

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Monster Beverage (MNST) at 24.70% and Constellation Brands (STZ) at 24.02% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

24.70%

Max: 32.02%
MNST: 24.70%
Q3: 16.61%
Median: 10.05%
Q1: 4.10%
Min: -10.50%

STZ

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

24.02%

Max: 32.02%
STZ: 24.02%
Q3: 16.61%
Median: 10.05%
Q1: 4.10%
Min: -10.50%

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ): A comparison of their ROE against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

For every dollar of sales, both Monster Beverage (MNST) at 22.66% and Constellation Brands (STZ) at 20.90% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

22.66%

Max: 24.83%
MNST: 22.66%
Q3: 11.22%
Median: 5.94%
Q1: 2.05%
Min: -11.49%

STZ

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

20.90%

Max: 24.83%
STZ: 20.90%
Q3: 11.22%
Median: 5.94%
Q1: 2.05%
Min: -11.49%

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ): A comparison of their net margin against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Monster Beverage (MNST) at 28.06% and Constellation Brands (STZ) at 33.58% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

28.06%

Max: 34.91%
MNST: 28.06%
Q3: 17.57%
Median: 11.06%
Q1: 4.15%
Min: -15.06%

STZ

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

33.58%

Max: 34.91%
STZ: 33.58%
Q3: 17.57%
Median: 11.06%
Q1: 4.15%
Min: -15.06%

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ): A comparison of their operating margin against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Constellation Brands (STZ)
Metric	MNST	STZ
ROE (TTM)	24.70%	24.02%
ROA (TTM)	16.44%	8.68%
Net Margin (TTM)	22.66%	20.90%
Operating Margin (TTM)	28.06%	33.58%
Gross Margin (TTM)	55.27%	52.77%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Monster Beverage (MNST) at 10.70% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Constellation Brands (STZ) at -10.48% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Only one side can be read here: Monster Beverage (MNST) reports EPS growth of 19.75%, ranked against its industry; Constellation Brands (STZ) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Constellation Brands (STZ)
Metric	MNST	STZ
Revenue Growth (YoY)	10.70%	-10.48%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	9.54%	-1.12%
EPS Growth (YoY)	19.75%	--
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	20.28%	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Monster Beverage (MNST) at 3.82 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Constellation Brands (STZ) at 1.00 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

3.82

Max: 4.01
MNST: 3.82
Q3: 2.35
Median: 1.53
Q1: 1.02
Min: 0.33

STZ

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

1.00

Max: 4.01
Q3: 2.35
Median: 1.53
Q1: 1.02
STZ: 1.00
Min: 0.33

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ): A comparison of their current ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Constellation Brands (STZ) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 1.16 against its industry range, while Monster Beverage (MNST) reports no figure this period.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

Max: 2.19
Q3: 1.11
Median: 0.68
Q1: 0.33
Min: 0.00
MNST: --

STZ

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

1.16

Max: 2.19
STZ: 1.16
Q3: 1.11
Median: 0.68
Q1: 0.33
Min: 0.00

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ): MNST does not report debt-to-equity ratio, so it has no value marker; STZ is benchmarked against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Constellation Brands (STZ)
Metric	MNST	STZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)	3.82	1.00
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	--	1.16
Net Debt / EBITDA	-1.25	2.98

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Monster Beverage (MNST) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Constellation Brands (STZ) reports a yield of 2.84%, ranking against industry peers normally.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.00%

Max: 9.38%
Q3: 3.77%
Median: 1.76%
MNST: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

STZ

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

2.84%

Max: 9.38%
Q3: 3.77%
STZ: 2.84%
Median: 1.76%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Monster Beverage (MNST) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Constellation Brands (STZ) reports a payout of 36.71%, ranking against industry peers normally.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

0.00%

Max: 199.19%
Q3: 81.03%
Median: 41.52%
MNST: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

STZ

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

36.71%

Max: 199.19%
Q3: 81.03%
Median: 41.52%
STZ: 36.71%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Constellation Brands (STZ)
Metric	MNST	STZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	2.84%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	36.71%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Constellation Brands (STZ) at 12.71 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Monster Beverage (MNST) at 41.56 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

41.56

Max: 52.52
MNST: 41.56
Q3: 30.78
Median: 18.76
Q1: 12.77
Min: 4.72

STZ

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

12.71

Max: 52.52
Q3: 30.78
Median: 18.76
Q1: 12.77
STZ: 12.71
Min: 4.72

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Both look expensive on sales: Constellation Brands (STZ) at 2.61 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Monster Beverage (MNST) at 9.34 prices even higher, above its industry range.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

9.34

MNST: 9.34
Max: 4.64
Q3: 2.27
Median: 1.17
Q1: 0.52
Min: 0.00

STZ

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

2.61

Max: 4.64
STZ: 2.61
Q3: 2.27
Median: 1.17
Q1: 0.52
Min: 0.00

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Constellation Brands (STZ) at 2.81 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Monster Beverage (MNST) at 9.09 prices above its benchmark range — MNST looks rich relative to book.

MNST

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

9.09

MNST: 9.09
Max: 6.35
Q3: 3.07
Median: 1.58
Q1: 0.82
Min: 0.00

STZ

Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group

2.81

Max: 6.35
Q3: 3.07
STZ: 2.81
Median: 1.58
Q1: 0.82
Min: 0.00

Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Monster Beverage (MNST) and Constellation Brands (STZ)
Metric	MNST	STZ
P/E Ratio (TTM)	41.56	12.71
P/S Ratio (TTM)	9.34	2.61
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	9.09	2.81
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	--	4.66%