Seek Returns logo

MNST vs. SJM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MNST and SJM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMNSTSJM
Company NameMonster Beverage CorporationThe J. M. Smucker Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryBeveragesFood Products
Market Capitalization61.36 billion USD12.08 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateDecember 9, 1985October 31, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MNST and SJM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MNST vs. SJM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMNSTSJM
5-Day Price Return-2.00%1.55%
13-Week Price Return-0.41%0.60%
26-Week Price Return23.10%12.74%
52-Week Price Return33.67%-6.42%
Month-to-Date Return6.96%5.46%
Year-to-Date Return19.56%2.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.45M1.71M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.77M1.79M
3-Month Volatility23.15%38.40%
Beta0.540.24

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MNST

24.73%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

MNST’s Return on Equity of 24.73% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SJM

-17.34%

Food Products Industry

Max
27.15%
Q3
15.66%
Median
10.47%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-2.46%

SJM has a negative Return on Equity of -17.34%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MNST vs. SJM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MNST

20.54%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.54% places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SJM

-14.10%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
9.92%
Median
6.38%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-0.92%

SJM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -14.10%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MNST vs. SJM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MNST

26.93%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.93% places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SJM

-7.38%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.27%
Median
9.73%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.10%

SJM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -7.38%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MNST vs. SJM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMNSTSJM
Return on Equity (TTM)24.73%-17.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.23%-6.45%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.54%-14.10%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.93%-7.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)55.18%38.89%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MNST

3.52

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

MNST’s Current Ratio of 3.52 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Beverages industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

SJM

0.81

Food Products Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.40
Median
1.61
Q1
1.28
Min
0.55

SJM’s Current Ratio of 0.81 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MNST vs. SJM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MNST

0.00

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, MNST’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SJM

1.26

Food Products Industry

Max
1.87
Q3
0.90
Median
0.48
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

SJM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Food Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.26. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MNST vs. SJM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MNST

123.81

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 123.81, MNST demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Beverages industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

SJM

-1.69

Food Products Industry

Max
70.39
Q3
32.08
Median
9.51
Q1
4.55
Min
-1.69

SJM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1.69. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MNST vs. SJM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMNSTSJM
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.520.81
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.860.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.001.26
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)123.81-1.69

Growth

Revenue Growth

MNST vs. SJM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MNST vs. SJM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MNST

0.00%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

MNST currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SJM

3.79%

Food Products Industry

Max
7.43%
Q3
4.12%
Median
2.67%
Q1
1.57%
Min
0.00%

SJM’s Dividend Yield of 3.79% is consistent with its peers in the Food Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MNST vs. SJM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MNST

0.00%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

MNST has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SJM

59.47%

Food Products Industry

Max
202.50%
Q3
109.53%
Median
67.28%
Q1
39.33%
Min
0.00%

SJM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.47% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MNST vs. SJM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMNSTSJM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.79%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%59.47%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MNST

40.32

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

A P/E Ratio of 40.32 places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SJM

--

Food Products Industry

Max
35.81
Q3
22.88
Median
17.13
Q1
13.91
Min
2.77

P/E Ratio data for SJM is currently unavailable.

MNST vs. SJM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MNST

8.28

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

With a P/S Ratio of 8.28, MNST trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Beverages industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SJM

1.38

Food Products Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.86
Median
1.14
Q1
0.68
Min
0.12

SJM’s P/S Ratio of 1.38 aligns with the market consensus for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MNST vs. SJM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MNST

8.49

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

At 8.49, MNST’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Beverages industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SJM

2.03

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.76
Median
1.98
Q1
1.26
Min
0.52

SJM’s P/B Ratio of 2.03 is within the conventional range for the Food Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MNST vs. SJM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMNSTSJM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)40.32--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.281.38
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.492.03
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)34.2014.70