Seek Returns logo

MMM vs. XYL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MMM and XYL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMMMXYL
Company Name3M CompanyXylem Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryIndustrial ConglomeratesMachinery
Market Capitalization83.01 billion USD34.73 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962October 13, 2011
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MMM and XYL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MMM vs. XYL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMMMXYL
5-Day Price Return0.98%0.59%
13-Week Price Return4.05%13.89%
26-Week Price Return3.76%9.53%
52-Week Price Return21.19%5.35%
Month-to-Date Return4.44%-1.35%
Year-to-Date Return20.73%22.97%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.99M1.07M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.40M1.33M
3-Month Volatility23.22%25.25%
Beta1.041.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
14.23%
Median
7.81%
Q1
5.91%
Min
-3.58%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

XYL

8.70%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

XYL’s Return on Equity of 8.70% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MMM vs. XYL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
18.70%
Q3
12.58%
Median
9.26%
Q1
3.87%
Min
-2.26%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

XYL

10.74%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

XYL’s Net Profit Margin of 10.74% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MMM vs. XYL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
25.69%
Q3
17.03%
Median
12.85%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-0.73%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

XYL

11.81%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

XYL’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.81% is around the midpoint for the Machinery industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MMM vs. XYL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMMMXYL
Return on Equity (TTM)91.40%8.70%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.93%5.66%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.01%10.74%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.46%11.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.11%37.81%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.64
Median
1.38
Q1
1.13
Min
0.61

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

XYL

1.90

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

XYL’s Current Ratio of 1.90 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MMM vs. XYL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.47
Median
0.99
Q1
0.66
Min
0.21

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

XYL

0.18

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, XYL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MMM vs. XYL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
11.17
Q3
8.02
Median
5.88
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

XYL

55.35

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

XYL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 55.35 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MMM vs. XYL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMMMXYL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.721.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.121.31
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.060.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-15.3155.35

Growth

Revenue Growth

MMM vs. XYL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MMM vs. XYL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MMM

1.88%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
10.17%
Q3
5.53%
Median
3.14%
Q1
1.88%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.88% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

XYL

1.05%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

XYL’s Dividend Yield of 1.05% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

MMM vs. XYL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
181.91%
Q3
95.57%
Median
50.60%
Q1
35.01%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

XYL

39.55%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

XYL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.55% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MMM vs. XYL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMMMXYL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.88%1.05%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)39.27%39.55%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MMM

20.92

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
36.98
Q3
22.09
Median
12.18
Q1
8.93
Min
5.63

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 20.92 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

XYL

37.52

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

A P/E Ratio of 37.52 places XYL in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MMM vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MMM

3.35

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
3.60
Q3
2.10
Median
0.68
Q1
0.42
Min
0.11

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

XYL

4.03

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

XYL’s P/S Ratio of 4.03 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MMM vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.89
Q3
2.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.60
Min
0.27

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

XYL

2.84

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

XYL’s P/B Ratio of 2.84 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MMM vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMMMXYL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.9237.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.354.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)18.902.84
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.8640.41