MMM vs. SYM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 29, 2025

Here’s a clear look at MMM and SYM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	MMM	SYM
Company Name	3M Company	Symbotic Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Industrial Conglomerates	Machinery
Market Capitalization	83.37 billion USD	28.18 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGM
Listing Date	January 2, 1962	March 9, 2021
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MMM and SYM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MMM vs. SYM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	MMM	SYM
5-Day Price Return	1.39%	8.72%
13-Week Price Return	4.71%	55.42%
26-Week Price Return	7.97%	95.06%
52-Week Price Return	18.72%	109.62%
Month-to-Date Return	4.90%	-11.53%
Year-to-Date Return	21.26%	101.31%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.92M	1.79M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.34M	2.05M
3-Month Volatility	23.03%	89.22%
Beta	1.05	2.05

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 21.93%
Q3: 14.23%
Median: 7.81%
Q1: 5.91%
Min: -3.58%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SYM

-7.69%

Machinery Industry

Max: 34.68%
Q3: 19.06%
Median: 13.13%
Q1: 8.53%
Min: -4.87%

SYM has a negative Return on Equity of -7.69%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MMM vs. SYM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 18.70%
Q3: 12.58%
Median: 9.26%
Q1: 3.87%
Min: -2.26%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SYM

-0.71%

Machinery Industry

Max: 19.74%
Q3: 11.24%
Median: 8.13%
Q1: 5.38%
Min: -1.11%

SYM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.71%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MMM vs. SYM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 25.69%
Q3: 17.03%
Median: 12.85%
Q1: 8.81%
Min: -0.73%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SYM

-5.20%

Machinery Industry

Max: 26.63%
Q3: 16.15%
Median: 11.27%
Q1: 7.72%
Min: -4.91%

SYM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5.20%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MMM vs. SYM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	MMM	SYM
Return on Equity (TTM)	91.40%	-7.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)	9.93%	-0.88%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	16.01%	-0.71%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	19.46%	-5.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	41.11%	16.30%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 2.19
Q3: 1.64
Median: 1.38
Q1: 1.13
Min: 0.61

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

SYM

1.08

Machinery Industry

Max: 3.83
Q3: 2.32
Median: 1.72
Q1: 1.28
Min: 0.78

SYM’s Current Ratio of 1.08 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MMM vs. SYM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 2.27
Q3: 1.47
Median: 0.99
Q1: 0.66
Min: 0.21

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

SYM

0.00

Machinery Industry

Max: 1.49
Q3: 0.75
Median: 0.44
Q1: 0.26
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, SYM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MMM vs. SYM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 11.17
Q3: 8.02
Median: 5.88
Q1: 2.73
Min: -2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

SYM

Machinery Industry

Max: 67.55
Q3: 33.79
Median: 13.87
Q1: 7.97
Min: -1.43

Interest Coverage Ratio data for SYM is currently unavailable.

MMM vs. SYM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	MMM	SYM
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.72	1.08
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.12	0.90
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	3.06	0.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	-15.31	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

MMM vs. SYM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MMM vs. SYM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MMM

1.88%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 10.17%
Q3: 5.53%
Median: 3.14%
Q1: 1.88%
Min: 0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.88% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

SYM

0.00%

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.32%
Q3: 2.84%
Median: 1.87%
Q1: 1.09%
Min: 0.00%

SYM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MMM vs. SYM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 181.91%
Q3: 95.57%
Median: 50.60%
Q1: 35.01%
Min: 1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SYM

0.00%

Machinery Industry

Max: 202.17%
Q3: 98.65%
Median: 55.54%
Q1: 29.03%
Min: 0.00%

SYM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MMM vs. SYM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	MMM	SYM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.88%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	39.27%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MMM

20.92

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 36.98
Q3: 22.09
Median: 12.18
Q1: 8.93
Min: 5.63

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 20.92 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SYM

Machinery Industry

Max: 53.66
Q3: 31.29
Median: 22.00
Q1: 16.18
Min: 7.00

P/E Ratio data for SYM is currently unavailable.

MMM vs. SYM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MMM

3.35

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 3.60
Q3: 2.10
Median: 0.68
Q1: 0.42
Min: 0.11

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SYM

11.92

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.04
Q3: 2.72
Median: 1.67
Q1: 1.04
Min: 0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 11.92, SYM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Machinery industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MMM vs. SYM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 4.89
Q3: 2.51
Median: 1.06
Q1: 0.60
Min: 0.27

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SYM

108.69

Machinery Industry

Max: 7.23
Q3: 3.90
Median: 2.52
Q1: 1.47
Min: 0.49

At 108.69, SYM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Machinery industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MMM vs. SYM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	MMM	SYM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	20.92	--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	3.35	11.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	18.90	108.69
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	30.86	54.72