MLM vs. SHW: Martin Marietta Materials vs. Sherwin-Williams Stock Comparison
How do Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) both fall under the Materials industry group, but MLM is classified in Construction Materials while SHW is classified in Chemicals.
| Profile Item | MLM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. | The Sherwin-Williams Company |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Construction Materials | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Construction Materials | Specialty Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 36.85 billion USD | 83.13 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 17, 1994 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | MLM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -12.23% | 5.74% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 6.32% | 13.18% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 5.43% | 2.84% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | MLM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 29.72% | 29.59% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.02 | 1.02 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -33.19% | -42.46% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 805.11K | 1.72M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | MLM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.56 | 0.05 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.75 | 0.08 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 63.70% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 6.02%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
MLM
Materials industry group
6.02%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- MLM
- 6.02%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
SHW
Materials industry group
63.70%
- SHW
- 63.70%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 31.88% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 10.74%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
MLM
Materials industry group
31.88%
- Max
- 38.66%
- MLM
- 31.88%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
SHW
Materials industry group
10.74%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- SHW
- 10.74%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 22.29% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 17.56% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
MLM
Materials industry group
22.29%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- MLM
- 22.29%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
SHW
Materials industry group
17.56%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- SHW
- 17.56%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | MLM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 6.02% | 63.70% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.27% | 9.48% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 31.88% | 10.74% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 22.29% | 17.56% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.74% | 48.60% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 8.62% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 2.06% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at -42.09% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at -2.75% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | MLM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 8.62% | 2.06% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -0.06% | 2.10% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -42.09% | -2.75% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 10.61% | 9.95% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 1.63 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.71 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for SHW.
MLM
Materials industry group
1.63
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- MLM
- 1.63
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
SHW
Materials industry group
0.71
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- SHW
- 0.71
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 0.75 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.72 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
MLM
Materials industry group
0.75
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- MLM
- 0.75
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.72
- SHW
- 3.72
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | MLM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.63 | 0.71 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.75 | 3.72 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.88 | 3.04 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 0.63% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.91% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
MLM
Materials industry group
0.63%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- MLM
- 0.63%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
0.91%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- SHW
- 0.91%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 24.85% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 29.35% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
MLM
Materials industry group
24.85%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- MLM
- 24.85%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
29.35%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- SHW
- 29.35%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | MLM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.63% | 0.91% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 24.85% | 29.35% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 31.66 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 38.67 sits in the richer quartile — MLM needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
MLM
Materials industry group
38.67
- Max
- 59.00
- MLM
- 38.67
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
SHW
Materials industry group
31.66
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- SHW
- 31.66
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.34 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 5.11 sits in the pricier quartile — MLM costs more per dollar of sales.
MLM
Materials industry group
5.11
- Max
- 9.62
- MLM
- 5.11
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.34
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- SHW
- 3.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) at 2.09 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 20.78 prices above its benchmark range — SHW looks rich relative to book.
MLM
Materials industry group
2.09
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- MLM
- 2.09
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
SHW
Materials industry group
20.78
- SHW
- 20.78
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | MLM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 38.67 | 31.66 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 5.11 | 3.34 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.09 | 20.78 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.54% | 2.98% |