MICC vs. STZ: Magnum Ice Cream vs. Constellation Brands Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) and Constellation Brands (STZ) both fall under the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group, but MICC is classified in Food Products while STZ is classified in Beverages.

Constellation Brands (STZ) has been public since March 17, 1992, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) listed only on December 8, 2025 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both MICC and STZ need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Constellation Brands (STZ) at 24.02% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 9.64% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for STZ.

Constellation Brands (STZ) at 20.90% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 2.24%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Constellation Brands (STZ) at 33.58% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 12.49%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at -0.47% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Constellation Brands (STZ) at -10.48% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Only one side can be read here: Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) reports EPS growth of -49.24%, ranked against its industry; Constellation Brands (STZ) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 1.01 and Constellation Brands (STZ) at 1.00 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

Both balance sheets lean debt-heavy versus peers, but MICC is more stretched: Constellation Brands (STZ) at 1.16 sits in the higher-leverage quartile and Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 3.43 is above its industry benchmark range.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Constellation Brands (STZ) reports a yield of 2.84%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Constellation Brands (STZ) reports a payout of 36.71%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Constellation Brands (STZ) at 12.71 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 39.67 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 1.45 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Constellation Brands (STZ) at 2.61 sits in the pricier quartile — STZ costs more per dollar of sales.

Constellation Brands (STZ) at 2.81 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 9.80 prices above its benchmark range — MICC looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics