Seek Returns logo

MGA vs. TSLA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MGA and TSLA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMGATSLA
Company NameMagna International Inc.Tesla, Inc.
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobile ComponentsAutomobiles
Market Capitalization12.98 billion USD1,044.72 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 5, 1984June 29, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MGA and TSLA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MGA vs. TSLA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMGATSLA
5-Day Price Return4.79%-3.48%
13-Week Price Return28.83%-5.32%
26-Week Price Return17.96%-9.00%
52-Week Price Return14.01%45.43%
Month-to-Date Return12.14%5.07%
Year-to-Date Return6.06%-19.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.80M77.14M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.49M104.32M
3-Month Volatility27.68%55.64%
Beta1.092.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MGA

10.10%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 10.10% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TSLA

8.22%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

TSLA’s Return on Equity of 8.22% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MGA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MGA

2.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TSLA

6.54%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.54% places TSLA in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MGA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MGA

4.33%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.33% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TSLA

6.06%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

TSLA’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.06% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MGA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMGATSLA
Return on Equity (TTM)10.10%8.22%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.76%4.89%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.91%6.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.33%6.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)13.83%17.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

1.16

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.16 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TSLA

2.04

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

TSLA’s Current Ratio of 2.04 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MGA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

0.48

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TSLA

0.09

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, TSLA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.09 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MGA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TSLA

71.48

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

TSLA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 71.48 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MGA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMGATSLA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.162.04
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.801.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.480.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.6671.48

Growth

Revenue Growth

MGA vs. TSLA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MGA vs. TSLA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MGA

4.35%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.35%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TSLA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MGA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MGA

44.88%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.88% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TSLA

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

TSLA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MGA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMGATSLA
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.35%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)44.88%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MGA

10.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/E Ratio of 10.33 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TSLA

172.34

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

At 172.34, TSLA’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Automobiles industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MGA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MGA

0.30

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.30 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TSLA

11.27

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 11.27, TSLA trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MGA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

0.85

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 0.85 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TSLA

13.23

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

At 13.23, TSLA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MGA vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMGATSLA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.33172.34
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.3011.27
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.8513.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.83187.03