MFG vs. WF: Mizuho Financial vs. Woori Financial Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Mizuho Financial (MFG) and Woori Financial (WF) are both classified in the Diversified Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Both Mizuho Financial (MFG) and Woori Financial (WF) trade as ADRs — their core financials are comparable, but keep FX, depositary-program fees, and dividend withholding in view for each.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Mizuho Financial (MFG) trades around 3.45M shares per day on average, while Woori Financial (WF) sees only 85.96K — a volume gap that can matter for position sizing, exit liquidity, and order execution.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Mizuho Financial (MFG) at 12.49% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Woori Financial (WF) at 7.93% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

Mizuho Financial (MFG) at 29.14% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while Woori Financial (WF) at 27.06% retains only a bottom-quartile share.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Mizuho Financial (MFG) in Banks and Woori Financial (WF) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Mizuho Financial (MFG) at 15.82% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Woori Financial (WF) at 5.30% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Mizuho Financial (MFG) at 43.61% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Woori Financial (WF) at 2.58% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Mizuho Financial (MFG) in Banks and Woori Financial (WF) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Mizuho Financial (MFG) in Banks and Woori Financial (WF) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Mizuho Financial (MFG) at 1,544.20% and Woori Financial (WF) at 1,108.19% yield above their industries’ entire benchmark ranges — high enough that dividend safety, not income, becomes the first question.

Both Mizuho Financial (MFG) at 24.88% and Woori Financial (WF) at 32.85% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Woori Financial (WF) at 8.04 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Mizuho Financial (MFG) at 12.88 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for WF, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Mizuho Financial (MFG) in Banks and Woori Financial (WF) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

Woori Financial (WF) at 0.63 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Mizuho Financial (MFG) at 1.57 is valued near its industry’s middle — WF is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

Valuation Metrics