Seek Returns logo

META vs. VOD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at META and VOD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

META is a standard domestic listing, while VOD trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolMETAVOD
Company NameMeta Platforms, Inc.Vodafone Group Public Limited Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesCommunication Services
GICS IndustryInteractive Media & ServicesWireless Telecommunication Services
Market Capitalization1,797.84 billion USD27.21 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 18, 2012November 2, 1988
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of META and VOD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

META vs. VOD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMETAVOD
5-Day Price Return-2.55%-2.41%
13-Week Price Return-0.37%3.85%
26-Week Price Return22.13%16.45%
52-Week Price Return22.80%13.87%
Month-to-Date Return-2.55%-2.41%
Year-to-Date Return22.23%23.10%
10-Day Avg. Volume13.51M36.65M
3-Month Avg. Volume12.02M47.82M
3-Month Volatility31.01%16.27%
Beta1.291.16

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

META

39.33%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.37%
Q3
33.08%
Median
10.37%
Q1
5.76%
Min
-24.17%

In the upper quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, META’s Return on Equity of 39.33% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

VOD

-7.42%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
27.45%
Q3
19.26%
Median
13.73%
Q1
9.72%
Min
-1.57%

VOD has a negative Return on Equity of -7.42%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

META vs. VOD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

META

39.99%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.74%
Q3
29.54%
Median
20.53%
Q1
7.52%
Min
-14.52%

A Net Profit Margin of 39.99% places META in the upper quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VOD

-10.83%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
23.76%
Q3
13.90%
Median
10.68%
Q1
5.59%
Min
-1.18%

VOD has a negative Net Profit Margin of -10.83%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

META vs. VOD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

META

44.02%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
65.96%
Q3
36.82%
Median
18.53%
Q1
7.69%
Min
-18.13%

An Operating Profit Margin of 44.02% places META in the upper quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VOD

-0.15%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
29.85%
Q3
23.51%
Median
20.15%
Q1
16.37%
Min
8.96%

VOD has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.15%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

META vs. VOD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMETAVOD
Return on Equity (TTM)39.33%-7.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)25.83%-3.11%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)39.99%-10.83%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)44.02%-0.15%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)81.95%33.43%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

META

1.97

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.72
Median
1.85
Q1
1.20
Min
0.25

META’s Current Ratio of 1.97 aligns with the median group of the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VOD

1.26

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
1.26
Q3
0.98
Median
0.71
Q1
0.56
Min
0.37

VOD’s Current Ratio of 1.26 is in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

META vs. VOD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

META

0.15

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
0.85
Q3
0.49
Median
0.29
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

META’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 is typical for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VOD

1.01

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.80
Q3
2.17
Median
1.52
Q1
0.93
Min
0.48

VOD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.01 is typical for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

META vs. VOD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

META

168.41

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
23.65
Q3
16.48
Median
6.73
Q1
-0.87
Min
-3.62

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 168.41, META demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

VOD

-0.02

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
12.67
Q3
6.47
Median
3.79
Q1
1.76
Min
-0.02

VOD has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.02. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

META vs. VOD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMETAVOD
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.971.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.711.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.151.01
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)168.41-0.02

Growth

Revenue Growth

META vs. VOD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

META vs. VOD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

META

0.29%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
3.07%
Q3
1.27%
Median
0.28%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

META’s Dividend Yield of 0.29% is consistent with its peers in the Interactive Media & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VOD

7.67%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
8.69%
Q3
5.44%
Median
3.79%
Q1
2.67%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 7.67%, VOD offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

META vs. VOD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

META

7.26%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
101.53%
Q3
40.64%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

META’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 7.26% is within the typical range for the Interactive Media & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VOD

94.94%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
169.59%
Q3
122.96%
Median
73.67%
Q1
63.98%
Min
1.50%

VOD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 94.94% is within the typical range for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

META vs. VOD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMETAVOD
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.29%7.67%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)7.26%94.94%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

META

24.96

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
50.72
Q3
41.60
Median
25.84
Q1
18.18
Min
1.76

META’s P/E Ratio of 24.96 is within the middle range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VOD

--

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
31.43
Q3
21.97
Median
16.89
Q1
12.46
Min
7.52

P/E Ratio data for VOD is currently unavailable.

META vs. VOD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

META

9.98

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
23.76
Q3
11.40
Median
7.69
Q1
2.49
Min
0.00

META’s P/S Ratio of 9.98 aligns with the market consensus for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VOD

0.62

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
3.65
Q3
2.21
Median
1.32
Q1
1.17
Min
0.62

VOD’s P/S Ratio of 0.62 falls below the typical floor for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This could suggest the stock is overlooked or deeply undervalued relative to its sales, but may also reflect significant market concerns about its future.

META vs. VOD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

META

9.51

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
16.71
Q3
9.00
Median
3.97
Q1
2.19
Min
0.33

META’s P/B Ratio of 9.51 is in the upper tier for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

VOD

0.40

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
4.87
Q3
2.86
Median
2.07
Q1
1.40
Min
0.40

VOD’s P/B Ratio of 0.40 is in the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

META vs. VOD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Wireless Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMETAVOD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.96--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.980.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.510.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)35.602.69