Seek Returns logo

MCK vs. UHS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MCK and UHS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMCKUHS
Company NameMcKesson CorporationUniversal Health Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization84.45 billion USD11.70 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 10, 1994July 9, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MCK and UHS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MCK vs. UHS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMCKUHS
5-Day Price Return0.30%0.72%
13-Week Price Return-4.46%-1.48%
26-Week Price Return12.64%0.25%
52-Week Price Return21.04%-19.80%
Month-to-Date Return-2.11%10.47%
Year-to-Date Return19.13%2.49%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.83M0.70M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.86M0.89M
3-Month Volatility22.24%31.24%
Beta0.511.30

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MCK

39.43%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

MCK’s Return on Equity of 39.43% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UHS

18.62%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

In the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, UHS’s Return on Equity of 18.62% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MCK vs. UHS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MCK

0.92%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, MCK’s Net Profit Margin of 0.92% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

UHS

7.66%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.66% places UHS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MCK vs. UHS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MCK

1.23%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

MCK’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.23% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

UHS

10.99%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

An Operating Profit Margin of 10.99% places UHS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MCK vs. UHS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMCKUHS
Return on Equity (TTM)39.43%18.62%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.54%8.60%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)0.92%7.66%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.23%10.99%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)3.59%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MCK

0.90

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

MCK’s Current Ratio of 0.90 falls into the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UHS

1.29

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

UHS’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MCK vs. UHS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MCK

1.29

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

MCK’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.29. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

UHS

0.65

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

UHS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MCK vs. UHS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MCK

17.45

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.45, MCK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

UHS

9.05

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

UHS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.05 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MCK vs. UHS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMCKUHS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.901.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.511.19
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.290.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)17.459.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

MCK vs. UHS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MCK vs. UHS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MCK

0.40%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MCK’s Dividend Yield of 0.40% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UHS

0.45%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UHS’s Dividend Yield of 0.45% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MCK vs. UHS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MCK

10.47%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MCK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.47% is within the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UHS

4.19%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UHS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4.19% is within the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MCK vs. UHS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMCKUHS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.40%0.45%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)10.47%4.19%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MCK

26.24

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

MCK’s P/E Ratio of 26.24 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UHS

9.33

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, UHS’s P/E Ratio of 9.33 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MCK vs. UHS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MCK

0.24

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

MCK’s P/S Ratio of 0.24 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UHS

0.71

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

UHS’s P/S Ratio of 0.71 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MCK vs. UHS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MCK

4.06

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

MCK’s P/B Ratio of 4.06 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UHS

1.66

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

UHS’s P/B Ratio of 1.66 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MCK vs. UHS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMCKUHS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.249.33
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.240.71
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.061.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.2613.05