Seek Returns logo

MARA vs. UPST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MARA and UPST, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMARAUPST
Company NameMARA Holdings, Inc.Upstart Holdings, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustrySoftwareConsumer Finance
Market Capitalization5.71 billion USD6.65 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqCMNasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 4, 2012December 16, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MARA and UPST by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MARA vs. UPST: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMARAUPST
5-Day Price Return1.52%12.28%
13-Week Price Return-1.60%51.55%
26-Week Price Return-2.41%-16.80%
52-Week Price Return-8.66%74.14%
Month-to-Date Return-4.23%-15.40%
Year-to-Date Return-8.17%12.31%
10-Day Avg. Volume48.96M7.05M
3-Month Avg. Volume45.86M6.52M
3-Month Volatility67.66%71.55%
Beta6.422.44

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MARA

17.52%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

MARA’s Return on Equity of 17.52% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UPST

-0.97%

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
32.87%
Q3
20.39%
Median
14.14%
Q1
7.64%
Min
-10.63%

UPST has a negative Return on Equity of -0.97%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MARA vs. UPST: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MARA

85.02%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

MARA’s Net Profit Margin of 85.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Software industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

UPST

-0.75%

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
19.68%
Q3
15.94%
Median
13.37%
Q1
9.73%
Min
3.66%

UPST has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.75%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MARA vs. UPST: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MARA

40.16%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 40.16% places MARA in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UPST

-1.94%

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
50.11%
Q3
29.38%
Median
18.31%
Q1
14.26%
Min
-5.45%

UPST has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -1.94%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MARA vs. UPST: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMARAUPST
Return on Equity (TTM)17.52%-0.97%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.06%-0.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)85.02%-0.75%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)40.16%-1.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-26.24%80.43%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MARA

0.54

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

MARA’s Current Ratio of 0.54 falls into the lower quartile for the Software industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UPST

1.48

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
5.34
Q3
4.21
Median
2.67
Q1
0.71
Min
0.20

For the Consumer Finance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

MARA vs. UPST: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MARA

0.54

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

MARA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UPST

1.98

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
6.63
Q3
3.39
Median
2.21
Q1
0.94
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Consumer Finance industry.

MARA vs. UPST: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MARA

10.78

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

MARA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.78 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UPST

-15.69

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
49.63
Q3
39.33
Median
4.56
Q1
2.97
Min
-15.69

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Consumer Finance industry.

MARA vs. UPST: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMARAUPST
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.541.48
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.441.48
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.541.98
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)10.78-15.69

Growth

Revenue Growth

MARA vs. UPST: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MARA vs. UPST: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MARA

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MARA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UPST

0.00%

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
8.31%
Q3
3.93%
Median
2.51%
Q1
0.84%
Min
0.00%

UPST currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MARA vs. UPST: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MARA

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MARA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UPST

0.00%

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
145.89%
Q3
88.53%
Median
23.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UPST has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MARA vs. UPST: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMARAUPST
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MARA

8.39

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

MARA’s P/E Ratio of 8.39 is below the typical range for the Software industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

UPST

--

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
34.39
Q3
20.36
Median
13.05
Q1
9.29
Min
4.74

P/E Ratio data for UPST is currently unavailable.

MARA vs. UPST: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MARA

7.13

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

MARA’s P/S Ratio of 7.13 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UPST

7.24

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
4.28
Q3
2.67
Median
1.88
Q1
1.15
Min
0.55

With a P/S Ratio of 7.24, UPST trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Consumer Finance industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MARA vs. UPST: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MARA

1.15

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

MARA’s P/B Ratio of 1.15 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

UPST

8.52

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.40
Median
1.96
Q1
1.16
Min
0.26

At 8.52, UPST’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Consumer Finance industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MARA vs. UPST: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMARAUPST
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)8.39--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.137.24
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.158.52
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)1,423.4821.22