LYG vs. USB: Lloyds Banking vs. U.S. Bancorp Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Lloyds Banking (LYG) and U.S. Bancorp (USB) are both classified in the Diversified Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

U.S. Bancorp (USB) trades as ordinary local shares, while Lloyds Banking (LYG) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Lloyds Banking (LYG) at 13.69% sits in the top ROE quartile, while U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 12.84% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for LYG.

Both Lloyds Banking (LYG) at 30.61% and U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 30.01% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Lloyds Banking (LYG) in Banks and U.S. Bancorp (USB) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Lloyds Banking (LYG) at 7.66% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 4.41% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Both Lloyds Banking (LYG) at 11.29% and U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 21.90% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Lloyds Banking (LYG) in Banks and U.S. Bancorp (USB) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Lloyds Banking (LYG) in Banks and U.S. Bancorp (USB) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 3.51% offers top-quartile income, while Lloyds Banking (LYG) at 0.77% sits in the bottom quartile — a wide gap in cash returned to shareholders.

U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 40.86% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Lloyds Banking (LYG) at 41.85% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Lloyds Banking (LYG) at 9.79 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 11.57 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for LYG, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Lloyds Banking (LYG) in Banks and U.S. Bancorp (USB) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

On P/B ratio, both Lloyds Banking (LYG) at 1.19 and U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 1.55 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics