Seek Returns logo

LULU vs. SN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LULU and SN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLULUSN
Company Namelululemon athletica inc.SharkNinja, Inc.
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization20.91 billion USD14.54 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJuly 27, 2007July 31, 2023
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LULU and SN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LULU vs. SN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLULUSN
5-Day Price Return-0.72%-4.17%
13-Week Price Return-25.11%4.20%
26-Week Price Return-47.33%14.90%
52-Week Price Return-36.46%-2.69%
Month-to-Date Return-12.00%-11.81%
Year-to-Date Return-53.47%5.95%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.44M1.59M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.60M1.54M
3-Month Volatility50.44%31.73%
Beta1.081.76

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LULU

42.05%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
42.05%
Q3
24.41%
Median
17.18%
Q1
7.87%
Min
-8.23%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 42.05% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SN

26.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
27.70%
Q3
17.40%
Median
12.87%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-5.50%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, SN’s Return on Equity of 26.00% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LULU vs. SN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LULU

16.38%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
6.06%
Q1
3.93%
Min
-3.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.38% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SN

8.82%

Household Durables Industry

Max
16.37%
Q3
9.18%
Median
6.63%
Q1
3.85%
Min
-3.29%

SN’s Net Profit Margin of 8.82% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Household Durables industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LULU vs. SN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LULU

22.88%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
11.68%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.12%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.88% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SN

11.88%

Household Durables Industry

Max
21.32%
Q3
12.25%
Median
9.93%
Q1
5.57%
Min
-1.07%

SN’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.88% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LULU vs. SN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLULUSN
Return on Equity (TTM)42.05%26.00%
Return on Assets (TTM)24.10%11.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.38%8.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.88%11.88%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.10%48.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

2.27

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
2.22
Median
1.61
Q1
1.48
Min
0.74

LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.27 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

SN

1.94

Household Durables Industry

Max
6.09
Q3
3.79
Median
2.54
Q1
1.23
Min
0.83

SN’s Current Ratio of 1.94 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LULU vs. SN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.79
Q3
1.32
Median
0.60
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SN

0.34

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.87
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

SN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.34 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LULU vs. SN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LULU

-47.83

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
32.83
Median
7.87
Q1
3.52
Min
-32.49

LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

SN

9.98

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

SN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.98 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LULU vs. SN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLULUSN
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.271.94
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.851.07
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.34
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-47.839.98

Growth

Revenue Growth

LULU vs. SN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LULU vs. SN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.22%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.34%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SN

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.61%
Q3
3.97%
Median
2.00%
Q1
0.18%
Min
0.00%

SN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LULU vs. SN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
94.60%
Median
52.65%
Q1
35.04%
Min
0.00%

LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SN

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
129.55%
Q3
65.55%
Median
42.15%
Q1
6.45%
Min
0.00%

SN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LULU vs. SN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLULUSN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LULU

12.50

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
48.15
Q3
33.82
Median
20.70
Q1
14.57
Min
7.12

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 12.50 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SN

27.31

Household Durables Industry

Max
33.67
Q3
19.33
Median
12.58
Q1
9.62
Min
6.48

A P/E Ratio of 27.31 places SN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LULU vs. SN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LULU

2.05

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.35
Q3
3.06
Median
1.66
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

LULU’s P/S Ratio of 2.05 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SN

2.41

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.39
Median
0.90
Q1
0.54
Min
0.19

SN’s P/S Ratio of 2.41 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LULU vs. SN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LULU

5.37

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.74
Q3
5.59
Median
3.41
Q1
2.01
Min
0.56

LULU’s P/B Ratio of 5.37 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SN

6.32

Household Durables Industry

Max
3.26
Q3
2.01
Median
1.38
Q1
1.00
Min
0.58

At 6.32, SN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LULU vs. SN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLULUSN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.5027.31
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.052.41
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.376.32
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.5130.89