Seek Returns logo

LTM vs. PAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LTM and PAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both LTM and PAC are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolLTMPAC
Company Name--Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
CountryChileMexico
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryPassenger AirlinesTransportation Infrastructure
Market Capitalization14.63 billion USD12.35 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 25, 2024February 27, 2006
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LTM and PAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LTM vs. PAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLTMPAC
5-Day Price Return5.48%-2.95%
13-Week Price Return32.55%-0.18%
26-Week Price Return50.72%13.31%
52-Week Price Return64.89%51.23%
Month-to-Date Return8.56%5.75%
Year-to-Date Return68.17%25.03%
10-Day Avg. Volume3,892.38M0.51M
3-Month Avg. Volume1,983.74M0.69M
3-Month Volatility24.83%24.54%
Beta0.581.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LTM

141.28%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
49.96%
Q3
28.15%
Median
15.41%
Q1
8.29%
Min
-11.01%

LTM’s Return on Equity of 141.28% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PAC

42.80%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
26.85%
Q3
15.47%
Median
10.39%
Q1
7.70%
Min
0.79%

PAC’s Return on Equity of 42.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LTM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LTM

8.88%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
17.65%
Q3
8.90%
Median
5.80%
Q1
2.02%
Min
-3.12%

LTM’s Net Profit Margin of 8.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PAC

23.19%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
49.26%
Q3
27.75%
Median
17.98%
Q1
10.18%
Min
4.19%

PAC’s Net Profit Margin of 23.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LTM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LTM

14.24%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
12.33%
Median
8.62%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-2.88%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.24% places LTM in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PAC

42.29%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
60.91%
Q3
43.57%
Median
30.58%
Q1
16.77%
Min
1.18%

PAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 42.29% is around the midpoint for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LTM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLTMPAC
Return on Equity (TTM)141.28%42.80%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.44%11.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.88%23.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.24%42.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)27.19%100.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LTM

0.60

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.94
Median
0.76
Q1
0.54
Min
0.17

LTM’s Current Ratio of 0.60 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PAC

0.93

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
1.90
Median
1.35
Q1
0.86
Min
0.28

PAC’s Current Ratio of 0.93 aligns with the median group of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LTM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LTM

8.22

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
9.80
Q3
4.82
Median
1.30
Q1
0.89
Min
0.00

LTM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Passenger Airlines industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.22. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

PAC

2.48

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.70
Q3
1.70
Median
0.83
Q1
0.30
Min
0.04

PAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.48. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LTM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LTM

2.97

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.60
Q3
16.29
Median
6.75
Q1
1.94
Min
-8.55

LTM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PAC

5.20

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
29.26
Q3
20.33
Median
8.92
Q1
5.22
Min
2.01

In the lower quartile for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, PAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.20 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

LTM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLTMPAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.600.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.530.93
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)8.222.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.975.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

LTM vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LTM vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LTM

2.14%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
3.95%
Median
1.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LTM’s Dividend Yield of 2.14% is consistent with its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PAC

2.53%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
7.48%
Q3
3.76%
Median
2.40%
Q1
1.13%
Min
0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LTM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LTM

49.16%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
71.59%
Q3
38.54%
Median
8.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LTM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.16% is in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

PAC

71.16%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
197.82%
Q3
109.11%
Median
70.69%
Q1
33.40%
Min
0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.16% is within the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LTM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLTMPAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.14%2.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)49.16%71.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LTM

11.74

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
13.29
Q3
11.94
Median
8.78
Q1
7.42
Min
3.07

LTM’s P/E Ratio of 11.74 is within the middle range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PAC

19.76

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
35.90
Q3
21.76
Median
17.41
Q1
12.31
Min
5.46

PAC’s P/E Ratio of 19.76 is within the middle range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LTM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LTM

1.04

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.74
Median
0.61
Q1
0.44
Min
0.09

LTM’s P/S Ratio of 1.04 is in the upper echelon for the Passenger Airlines industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PAC

4.58

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
10.76
Q3
5.52
Median
2.96
Q1
1.59
Min
0.84

PAC’s P/S Ratio of 4.58 aligns with the market consensus for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LTM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LTM

12.93

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
2.89
Median
1.84
Q1
1.22
Min
0.56

At 12.93, LTM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Passenger Airlines industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PAC

9.90

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.46
Q3
2.80
Median
1.80
Q1
1.12
Min
0.37

At 9.90, PAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LTM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLTMPAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.7419.76
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.044.58
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.939.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.1518.23