LRCX vs. SKHY: Lam Research vs. SK hynix Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Lam Research (LRCX) and SK hynix (SKHY) both belong to the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, though LRCX is classified under Semiconductor Materials & Equipment while SKHY falls under Semiconductors.

Lam Research (LRCX) has been public since May 4, 1984, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while SK hynix (SKHY) listed only on July 10, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Lam Research (LRCX) trades as ordinary local shares, while SK hynix (SKHY) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both LRCX and SKHY need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Lam Research (LRCX) at 70.12% and SK hynix (SKHY) at 92.54% turn shareholders’ equity into profit at rates above their industry benchmark ranges for ROE. That is a strong capital-efficiency signal, though leverage and the equity base still matter.

SK hynix (SKHY) at 70.27% keeps the most of each sales dollar — above its industry’s net margin range — and Lam Research (LRCX) at 32.34% also retains a top-quartile share.

SK hynix (SKHY) at 79.66% shows unusually strong operating efficiency — above its industry’s operating margin range — and Lam Research (LRCX) at 39.95% also operates in the top quartile.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Lam Research (LRCX) at 26.02% and SK hynix (SKHY) at 46.76% sit in the top peer quartile for revenue growth, so each is growing its top line faster than typical industry peers.

SK hynix (SKHY) at 112.46% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Lam Research (LRCX) at 38.80% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for SKHY.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Lam Research (LRCX) at 2.48 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while SK hynix (SKHY) at 26.88 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

Both Lam Research (LRCX) at 0.27 and SK hynix (SKHY) at 0.05 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Lam Research (LRCX) at 0.60% pays an industry-typical yield; SK hynix (SKHY) at 2,118.64% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

SK hynix (SKHY) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Lam Research (LRCX) reports a payout of 16.54%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

SK hynix (SKHY) at 8.12 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Lam Research (LRCX) at 29.87 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for SKHY, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

SK hynix (SKHY) at 0.00 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Lam Research (LRCX) at 9.60 prices around its industry’s middle — SKHY costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

SK hynix (SKHY) at 3.95 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Lam Research (LRCX) at 18.00 prices above its benchmark range — LRCX looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics