LNG vs. MPC: Cheniere Energy vs. Marathon Petroleum Stock Comparison
How do Cheniere Energy (LNG) and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cheniere Energy (LNG) and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though LNG is classified under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation while MPC falls under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing.
| Profile Item | LNG | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cheniere Energy Inc. | Marathon Petroleum Corp. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
| Market Capitalization | 56.76 billion USD | 101.49 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | April 4, 1994 | June 24, 2011 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | LNG | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 36.89% | 104.94% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.36% | 42.97% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 22.59% | 45.42% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | LNG | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 31.41% | 37.53% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.06 | 0.56 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -24.87% | -44.75% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.00M | 2.56M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | LNG | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.04 | 2.68 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.54 | 4.10 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 60.46% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 39.68% also sits in the top quartile.
LNG
Energy industry group
39.68%
- Max
- 53.85%
- LNG
- 39.68%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
MPC
Energy industry group
60.46%
- MPC
- 60.46%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 13.40% and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 8.34% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
LNG
Energy industry group
13.40%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- LNG
- 13.40%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
MPC
Energy industry group
8.34%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- MPC
- 8.34%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 30.82% and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 17.98% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
LNG
Energy industry group
30.82%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- LNG
- 30.82%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
MPC
Energy industry group
17.98%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- MPC
- 17.98%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | LNG | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 39.68% | 60.46% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.61% | 13.75% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 13.40% | 8.34% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 30.82% | 17.98% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 34.89% | 16.20% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 27.21% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at -4.44% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for LNG.
EPS Growth
Both Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 69.93% and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 31.15% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | LNG | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 27.21% | -4.44% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -15.77% | -9.23% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 69.93% | 31.15% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 62.34% | -22.24% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 0.90 and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 1.45 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
LNG
Energy industry group
0.90
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- LNG
- 0.90
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
MPC
Energy industry group
1.45
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- MPC
- 1.45
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both balance sheets lean debt-heavy versus peers, but LNG is more stretched: Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 1.15 sits in the higher-leverage quartile and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 2.31 is above its industry benchmark range.
LNG
Energy industry group
2.31
- LNG
- 2.31
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
MPC
Energy industry group
1.15
- Max
- 1.75
- MPC
- 1.15
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | LNG | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.90 | 1.45 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 2.31 | 1.15 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.26 | 0.88 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 0.82% and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 1.09% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
LNG
Energy industry group
0.82%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- LNG
- 0.82%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MPC
Energy industry group
1.09%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- MPC
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 15.80% and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 7.93% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
LNG
Energy industry group
15.80%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- LNG
- 15.80%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MPC
Energy industry group
7.93%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- MPC
- 7.93%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | LNG | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.82% | 1.09% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 15.80% | 7.93% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 7.39 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 19.78 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for MPC, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
LNG
Energy industry group
19.78
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- LNG
- 19.78
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
MPC
Energy industry group
7.39
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- MPC
- 7.39
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 0.58 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 2.50 prices around its industry’s middle — MPC costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
LNG
Energy industry group
2.50
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- LNG
- 2.50
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
MPC
Energy industry group
0.58
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- MPC
- 0.58
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Measured against book value, both Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 8.70 and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 4.42 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.
LNG
Energy industry group
8.70
- LNG
- 8.70
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
MPC
Energy industry group
4.42
- MPC
- 4.42
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LNG | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 19.78 | 7.39 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.50 | 0.58 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 8.70 | 4.42 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.17% | 16.00% |