Seek Returns logo

LMT vs. RKLB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LMT and RKLB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLMTRKLB
Company NameLockheed Martin CorporationRocket Lab Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization103.32 billion USD20.61 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqCM
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962November 24, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LMT and RKLB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LMT vs. RKLB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLMTRKLB
5-Day Price Return2.74%-2.74%
13-Week Price Return-6.47%102.26%
26-Week Price Return-1.33%55.35%
52-Week Price Return-20.53%697.77%
Month-to-Date Return5.13%-6.36%
Year-to-Date Return-8.93%68.83%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.72M18.12M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.71M20.90M
3-Month Volatility32.09%73.29%
Beta0.262.19

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LMT

65.82%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

LMT’s Return on Equity of 65.82% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

RKLB

-48.92%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

RKLB has a negative Return on Equity of -48.92%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

LMT vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LMT

5.85%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

LMT’s Net Profit Margin of 5.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RKLB

-44.32%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

RKLB has a negative Net Profit Margin of -44.32%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

LMT vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LMT

8.29%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

LMT’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.29% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RKLB

-44.19%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

RKLB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -44.19%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

LMT vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLMTRKLB
Return on Equity (TTM)65.82%-48.92%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.42%-17.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.85%-44.32%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.29%-44.19%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)8.25%27.30%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LMT

0.99

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

LMT’s Current Ratio of 0.99 falls into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RKLB

2.08

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

RKLB’s Current Ratio of 2.08 is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LMT vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LMT

4.06

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.06, LMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

RKLB

1.02

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

RKLB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.02 is typical for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LMT vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LMT

7.49

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

LMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RKLB

-45.87

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

RKLB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -45.87. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

LMT vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLMTRKLB
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.992.08
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.831.60
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)4.061.02
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.49-45.87

Growth

Revenue Growth

LMT vs. RKLB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LMT vs. RKLB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LMT

3.03%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Yield of 3.03% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

RKLB

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RKLB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LMT vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LMT

73.60%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 73.60% is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

RKLB

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RKLB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LMT vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLMTRKLB
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.03%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)73.60%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LMT

24.29

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

LMT’s P/E Ratio of 24.29 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RKLB

--

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

P/E Ratio data for RKLB is currently unavailable.

LMT vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LMT

1.42

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

LMT’s P/S Ratio of 1.42 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RKLB

44.23

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 44.23, RKLB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LMT vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LMT

20.34

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

At 20.34, LMT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RKLB

18.80

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

At 18.80, RKLB’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LMT vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLMTRKLB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.29--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.4244.23
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)20.3418.80
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.49--