LII vs. WWD: Lennox vs. Woodward Stock Comparison
How do Lennox (LII) and Woodward (WWD) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Lennox (LII) and Woodward (WWD) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but LII is classified in Building Products while WWD is classified in Aerospace & Defense.
| Profile Item | LII | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Lennox International Inc. | Woodward, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Building Products | Aerospace & Defense |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Building Products | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 11.70 billion USD | 18.74 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | July 29, 1999 | April 4, 1994 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | LII | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -27.83% | 25.66% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -2.32% | 36.83% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 3.79% | 23.54% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | LII | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 41.59% | 40.29% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.18 | 0.87 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -49.95% | -37.25% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 563.34K | 665.85K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | LII | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.77 | 0.53 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.96 | 0.85 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Lennox (LII) at 62.82% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Woodward (WWD) at 22.34% also sits in the top quartile.
LII
Capital Goods industry group
62.82%
- LII
- 62.82%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
WWD
Capital Goods industry group
22.34%
- Max
- 40.55%
- WWD
- 22.34%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Lennox (LII) at 13.76% and Woodward (WWD) at 13.17% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
LII
Capital Goods industry group
13.76%
- Max
- 27.47%
- LII
- 13.76%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
WWD
Capital Goods industry group
13.17%
- Max
- 27.47%
- WWD
- 13.17%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Lennox (LII) at 20.57% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Woodward (WWD) at 17.76%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
LII
Capital Goods industry group
20.57%
- Max
- 36.60%
- LII
- 20.57%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
WWD
Capital Goods industry group
17.76%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- WWD
- 17.76%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | LII | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 62.82% | 22.34% |
| ROA (TTM) | 15.93% | 8.62% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 13.76% | 13.17% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 20.57% | 17.76% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 32.62% | 29.63% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Woodward (WWD) at 7.30% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Lennox (LII) at -2.73% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Lennox (LII) at 1.11% and Woodward (WWD) at 19.63% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | LII | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -2.73% | 7.30% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 3.26% | 14.40% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 1.11% | 19.63% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 17.97% | 38.44% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Woodward (WWD) at 1.65 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Lennox (LII) at 1.21 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for LII.
LII
Capital Goods industry group
1.21
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- LII
- 1.21
- Min
- 0.36
WWD
Capital Goods industry group
1.65
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- WWD
- 1.65
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Woodward (WWD) at 0.56 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Lennox (LII) at 1.58 uses more debt funding than most peers.
LII
Capital Goods industry group
1.58
- Max
- 2.33
- LII
- 1.58
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
WWD
Capital Goods industry group
0.56
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- WWD
- 0.56
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | LII | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.21 | 1.65 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.58 | 0.56 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.73 | 1.13 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Lennox (LII) at 1.53% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Woodward (WWD) at 0.32% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, LII the richer one.
LII
Capital Goods industry group
1.53%
- Max
- 2.66%
- LII
- 1.53%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WWD
Capital Goods industry group
0.32%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- WWD
- 0.32%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Lennox (LII) at 24.68% and Woodward (WWD) at 13.35% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
LII
Capital Goods industry group
24.68%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- LII
- 24.68%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WWD
Capital Goods industry group
13.35%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- WWD
- 13.35%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | LII | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.53% | 0.32% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 24.68% | 13.35% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Lennox (LII) at 15.47 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Woodward (WWD) at 35.30 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for LII, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
LII
Capital Goods industry group
15.47
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- LII
- 15.47
- Min
- 3.03
WWD
Capital Goods industry group
35.30
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- WWD
- 35.30
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Lennox (LII) at 2.15 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Woodward (WWD) at 4.47 sits in the pricier quartile — WWD costs more per dollar of sales.
LII
Capital Goods industry group
2.15
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- LII
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
WWD
Capital Goods industry group
4.47
- Max
- 7.54
- WWD
- 4.47
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both Lennox (LII) at 8.88 and Woodward (WWD) at 7.60 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.
LII
Capital Goods industry group
8.88
- Max
- 9.66
- LII
- 8.88
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
WWD
Capital Goods industry group
7.60
- Max
- 9.66
- WWD
- 7.60
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LII | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 15.47 | 35.30 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.15 | 4.47 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 8.88 | 7.60 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.14% | 1.00% |