Seek Returns logo

LII vs. MMM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LII and MMM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLIIMMM
Company NameLennox International Inc.3M Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsIndustrial Conglomerates
Market Capitalization18.86 billion USD83.09 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 29, 1999January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LII and MMM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LII vs. MMM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLIIMMM
5-Day Price Return4.05%0.38%
13-Week Price Return-10.29%1.93%
26-Week Price Return-6.97%1.64%
52-Week Price Return-11.13%13.02%
Month-to-Date Return1.45%-0.23%
Year-to-Date Return-11.86%20.21%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.41M2.68M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.38M3.18M
3-Month Volatility33.31%22.89%
Beta1.181.05

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LII

99.44%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.60%
Median
15.43%
Q1
8.94%
Min
0.77%

LII’s Return on Equity of 99.44% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Building Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
13.64%
Median
9.41%
Q1
5.80%
Min
-3.73%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LII vs. MMM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LII

15.41%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.42%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.72%
Q1
4.81%
Min
0.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.41% places LII in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
26.43%
Q3
13.08%
Median
9.39%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-2.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LII vs. MMM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LII

19.52%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
17.70%
Median
12.14%
Q1
9.54%
Min
1.65%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.52% places LII in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
27.02%
Q3
17.23%
Median
12.90%
Q1
8.32%
Min
-3.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LII vs. MMM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLIIMMM
Return on Equity (TTM)99.44%91.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)24.03%9.93%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.41%16.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.52%19.46%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.13%41.11%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LII

1.41

Building Products Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.06
Median
1.60
Q1
1.30
Min
0.88

LII’s Current Ratio of 1.41 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.40
Q3
1.69
Median
1.35
Q1
1.14
Min
0.56

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LII vs. MMM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LII

1.31

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.62
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

LII’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Building Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.31. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.49
Median
0.91
Q1
0.63
Min
0.24

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

LII vs. MMM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LII

26.81

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
2.97

LII’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 26.81 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
19.80
Q3
10.68
Median
4.59
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

LII vs. MMM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLIIMMM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.411.72
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.711.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.313.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)26.81-15.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

LII vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LII vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LII

0.87%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.92%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

LII’s Dividend Yield of 0.87% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MMM

1.86%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
9.82%
Q3
5.04%
Median
3.09%
Q1
1.67%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.86% is consistent with its peers in the Industrial Conglomerates industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LII vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LII

19.61%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
76.90%
Median
30.70%
Q1
17.97%
Min
0.00%

LII’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.61% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
182.48%
Q3
97.89%
Median
55.48%
Q1
31.63%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LII vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLIIMMM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.87%1.86%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)19.61%39.27%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LII

22.48

Building Products Industry

Max
45.60
Q3
30.36
Median
21.97
Q1
17.37
Min
12.44

LII’s P/E Ratio of 22.48 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MMM

21.10

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
45.17
Q3
25.68
Median
15.16
Q1
8.58
Min
0.79

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 21.10 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LII vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LII

3.46

Building Products Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
3.09
Median
1.72
Q1
1.07
Min
0.37

LII’s P/S Ratio of 3.46 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MMM

3.38

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.18
Q3
2.15
Median
0.69
Q1
0.41
Min
0.09

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.38 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LII vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LII

22.59

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.69
Median
2.98
Q1
1.80
Min
0.66

At 22.59, LII’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Building Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
5.44
Q3
2.68
Median
0.97
Q1
0.52
Min
0.04

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LII vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLIIMMM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.4821.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.463.38
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)22.5918.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)25.3131.11