Seek Returns logo

LI vs. MGA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LI and MGA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LI trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, MGA is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolLIMGA
Company NameLi Auto Inc.Magna International Inc.
CountryChinaCanada
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobilesAutomobile Components
Market Capitalization26.24 billion USD13.38 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJuly 30, 2020October 5, 1984
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LI and MGA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LI vs. MGA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLIMGA
5-Day Price Return2.68%3.06%
13-Week Price Return-2.12%25.19%
26-Week Price Return1.40%22.63%
52-Week Price Return142.14%18.85%
Month-to-Date Return10.58%4.60%
Year-to-Date Return7.93%9.75%
10-Day Avg. Volume20.70M1.07M
3-Month Avg. Volume18.59M1.14M
3-Month Volatility46.20%25.24%
Beta1.251.01

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LI

11.44%

Automobiles Industry

Max
28.52%
Q3
12.70%
Median
5.15%
Q1
-1.62%
Min
-18.19%

LI’s Return on Equity of 11.44% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MGA

10.10%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.51%
Median
7.91%
Q1
5.60%
Min
-2.27%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 10.10% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LI vs. MGA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LI

5.64%

Automobiles Industry

Max
8.82%
Q3
5.80%
Median
2.77%
Q1
-1.08%
Min
-10.15%

LI’s Net Profit Margin of 5.64% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MGA

2.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
13.51%
Q3
7.21%
Median
5.02%
Q1
2.32%
Min
-3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LI vs. MGA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LI

5.75%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
6.94%
Median
4.50%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-13.85%

LI’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.75% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MGA

4.33%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.92%
Q3
10.29%
Median
6.94%
Q1
3.64%
Min
-0.31%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.33% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LI vs. MGA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLIMGA
Return on Equity (TTM)11.44%10.10%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.05%3.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.64%2.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.75%4.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.64%13.83%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LI

1.73

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.52
Median
1.29
Q1
1.09
Min
0.47

LI’s Current Ratio of 1.73 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MGA

1.16

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
2.54
Median
1.80
Q1
1.36
Min
0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.16 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LI vs. MGA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LI

0.37

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.07
Q3
1.17
Median
0.60
Q1
0.30
Min
0.05

LI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MGA

0.48

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.34
Q3
0.68
Median
0.38
Q1
0.21
Min
0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LI vs. MGA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LI

-16.94

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
37.26
Median
13.42
Q1
1.43
Min
-49.07

LI has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -16.94. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max
80.10
Q3
35.45
Median
11.20
Q1
4.03
Min
-21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LI vs. MGA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLIMGA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.731.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.500.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.370.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-16.948.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

LI vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LI vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.85%
Q3
4.84%
Median
2.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MGA

4.08%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
5.41%
Q3
3.10%
Median
2.23%
Q1
1.18%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.08%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LI vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
131.16%
Q3
60.59%
Median
36.73%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.00%

LI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MGA

44.88%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
99.04%
Q3
60.04%
Median
39.38%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.88% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LI vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLIMGA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%4.08%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%44.88%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LI

23.18

Automobiles Industry

Max
31.95
Q3
22.20
Median
11.17
Q1
7.39
Min
4.54

A P/E Ratio of 23.18 places LI in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MGA

11.00

Automobile Components Industry

Max
32.42
Q3
21.41
Median
15.09
Q1
13.02
Min
2.51

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/E Ratio of 11.00 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LI vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LI

1.31

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.92
Median
0.47
Q1
0.24
Min
0.09

LI’s P/S Ratio of 1.31 is in the upper echelon for the Automobiles industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MGA

0.32

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.13
Median
0.78
Q1
0.39
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.32 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LI vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LI

2.87

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
1.83
Median
0.79
Q1
0.47
Min
0.18

LI’s P/B Ratio of 2.87 is in the upper tier for the Automobiles industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MGA

0.85

Automobile Components Industry

Max
3.57
Q3
1.91
Median
1.08
Q1
0.78
Min
0.46

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 0.85 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LI vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLIMGA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.1811.00
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.310.32
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.870.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.507.27