LHX vs. VRT: L3Harris vs. Vertiv Stock Comparison
How do L3Harris (LHX) and Vertiv (VRT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
L3Harris (LHX) and Vertiv (VRT) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but LHX is classified in Aerospace & Defense while VRT is classified in Electrical Equipment.
| Profile Item | LHX | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Name | L3Harris Technologies, Inc. | Vertiv Holdings Co Class A Common Stock |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Electrical Equipment |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Electrical Components & Equipment |
| Market Capitalization | 48.39 billion USD | 70.41 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | December 31, 1981 | August 2, 2018 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | LHX | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -5.21% | 11.12% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 16.68% | 71.14% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 5.91% | 49.38% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Vertiv (VRT) has a highly aggressive beta of 2.15, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while L3Harris (LHX) is defensive at 0.46 and tends to be less market-sensitive — a wide gap in beta profiles.
| Metric | LHX | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 29.75% | 71.11% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.46 | 2.15 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -38.16% | -69.52% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.70M | 5.90M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | LHX | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.32 | 0.10 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.45 | 0.14 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Vertiv (VRT) at 46.57% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than L3Harris (LHX) at 10.03%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
10.03%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- LHX
- 10.03%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
46.57%
- VRT
- 46.57%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Vertiv (VRT) at 16.00% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of L3Harris (LHX) at 8.76%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
8.76%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- LHX
- 8.76%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
16.00%
- Max
- 27.47%
- VRT
- 16.00%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Vertiv (VRT) at 23.77% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of L3Harris (LHX) at 14.34%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
14.34%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- LHX
- 14.34%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
23.77%
- Max
- 36.60%
- VRT
- 23.77%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | LHX | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 10.03% | 46.57% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.56% | 11.94% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 8.76% | 16.00% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 14.34% | 23.77% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 25.55% | 38.12% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Vertiv (VRT) at 27.69% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while L3Harris (LHX) at 2.53% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for VRT.
EPS Growth
Vertiv (VRT) at 166.41% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than L3Harris (LHX) at 8.39%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | LHX | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 2.53% | 27.69% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.62% | 21.59% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 8.39% | 166.41% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 15.82% | 340.11% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 1.20 and Vertiv (VRT) at 1.39 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
1.20
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- LHX
- 1.20
- Min
- 0.36
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
1.39
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- VRT
- 1.39
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 0.52 and Vertiv (VRT) at 0.61 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
0.52
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- LHX
- 0.52
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
0.61
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- VRT
- 0.61
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | LHX | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.20 | 1.39 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.52 | 0.61 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.88 | -0.11 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
L3Harris (LHX) at 1.92% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Vertiv (VRT) at 0.11% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, LHX the richer one.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
1.92%
- Max
- 2.66%
- LHX
- 1.92%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
0.11%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- VRT
- 0.11%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Vertiv (VRT) at 4.67% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while L3Harris (LHX) at 46.09% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
46.09%
- Max
- 67.39%
- LHX
- 46.09%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
4.67%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- VRT
- 4.67%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | LHX | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.92% | 0.11% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 46.09% | 4.67% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both L3Harris (LHX) at 24.20 and Vertiv (VRT) at 34.18 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
24.20
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- LHX
- 24.20
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
34.18
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- VRT
- 34.18
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
L3Harris (LHX) at 2.07 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Vertiv (VRT) at 5.37 sits in the pricier quartile — VRT costs more per dollar of sales.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
2.07
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- LHX
- 2.07
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
5.37
- Max
- 7.54
- VRT
- 5.37
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
L3Harris (LHX) at 2.39 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Vertiv (VRT) at 12.80 prices above its benchmark range — VRT looks rich relative to book.
LHX
Capital Goods industry group
2.39
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- LHX
- 2.39
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
VRT
Capital Goods industry group
12.80
- VRT
- 12.80
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LHX | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 24.20 | 34.18 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.07 | 5.37 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.39 | 12.80 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 7.09% | 4.21% |