LEN vs. TPR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 30, 2025

Here’s a clear look at LEN and TPR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	LEN	TPR
Company Name	Lennar Corporation	Tapestry, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Household Durables	Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization	34.35 billion USD	21.02 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	October 6, 2000
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LEN and TPR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LEN vs. TPR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	TPR
5-Day Price Return	3.24%	2.63%
13-Week Price Return	23.35%	24.82%
26-Week Price Return	10.58%	19.38%
52-Week Price Return	-24.45%	148.29%
Month-to-Date Return	18.85%	-6.53%
Year-to-Date Return	1.75%	54.57%
10-Day Avg. Volume	3.28M	6.11M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.95M	4.22M
3-Month Volatility	38.77%	46.15%
Beta	1.42	1.61

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LEN

12.95%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 26.99%
Q3: 17.28%
Median: 12.66%
Q1: 7.34%
Min: 0.07%

LEN’s Return on Equity of 12.95% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TPR

10.99%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 53.33%
Q3: 26.13%
Median: 18.47%
Q1: 7.99%
Min: -10.49%

TPR’s Return on Equity of 10.99% is on par with the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LEN vs. TPR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LEN

9.20%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 15.50%
Q3: 8.99%
Median: 6.57%
Q1: 4.33%
Min: -0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.20% places LEN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TPR

2.61%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 23.35%
Q3: 13.49%
Median: 8.45%
Q1: 4.18%
Min: -3.90%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Net Profit Margin of 2.61% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

LEN vs. TPR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LEN

12.25%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 20.22%
Q3: 12.29%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 6.30%
Min: -1.92%

LEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.25% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TPR

4.21%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 29.47%
Q3: 20.87%
Median: 13.00%
Q1: 7.02%
Min: -3.59%

TPR’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.21% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

LEN vs. TPR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	TPR
Return on Equity (TTM)	12.95%	10.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)	8.66%	2.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	9.20%	2.61%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	12.25%	4.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	13.73%	75.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

7.62

Household Durables Industry

Max: 9.23
Q3: 4.50
Median: 2.35
Q1: 1.29
Min: 0.70

LEN’s Current Ratio of 7.62 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

TPR

1.87

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 3.91
Q3: 2.49
Median: 1.89
Q1: 1.43
Min: 0.80

TPR’s Current Ratio of 1.87 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LEN vs. TPR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max: 1.84
Q3: 0.90
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.19
Min: 0.00

LEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TPR

2.79

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 2.67
Q3: 1.29
Median: 0.59
Q1: 0.24
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.79, TPR operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

LEN vs. TPR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LEN

11.93

Household Durables Industry

Max: 140.40
Q3: 77.14
Median: 24.53
Q1: 5.69
Min: -17.01

LEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.93 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TPR

3.53

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 57.00
Q3: 35.85
Median: 9.20
Q1: 4.29
Min: -32.49

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.53 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

LEN vs. TPR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	TPR
Current Ratio (MRQ)	7.62	1.87
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.02	1.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.19	2.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	11.93	3.53

Growth

Revenue Growth

LEN vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LEN vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LEN

1.58%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 8.95%
Q3: 4.19%
Median: 1.88%
Q1: 0.03%
Min: 0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Yield of 1.58% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TPR

1.46%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 6.59%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 2.59%
Q1: 0.95%
Min: 0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Yield of 1.46% is consistent with its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LEN vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LEN

16.45%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 125.12%
Q3: 62.43%
Median: 39.18%
Q1: 5.55%
Min: 0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 16.45% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TPR

35.71%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 195.44%
Q3: 106.47%
Median: 58.77%
Q1: 36.52%
Min: 0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.71% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

LEN vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	TPR
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.58%	1.46%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	16.45%	35.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LEN

10.41

Household Durables Industry

Max: 29.75
Q3: 18.88
Median: 13.25
Q1: 9.26
Min: 6.32

LEN’s P/E Ratio of 10.41 is within the middle range for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TPR

111.89

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 63.29
Q3: 34.64
Median: 18.01
Q1: 13.88
Min: 6.04

At 111.89, TPR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LEN vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LEN

0.96

Household Durables Industry

Max: 2.12
Q3: 1.21
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.51
Min: 0.18

LEN’s P/S Ratio of 0.96 aligns with the market consensus for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TPR

2.92

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 5.46
Q3: 3.13
Median: 1.72
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.26

TPR’s P/S Ratio of 2.92 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LEN vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LEN

1.20

Household Durables Industry

Max: 4.21
Q3: 2.29
Median: 1.34
Q1: 0.98
Min: 0.59

LEN’s P/B Ratio of 1.20 is within the conventional range for the Household Durables industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TPR

21.26

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 9.76
Q3: 6.00
Median: 3.26
Q1: 1.97
Min: 0.69

At 21.26, TPR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LEN vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	LEN	TPR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	10.41	111.89
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.96	2.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.20	21.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	15.19	19.15