Seek Returns logo

LAMR vs. PCH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LAMR and PCH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both LAMR and PCH are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

SymbolLAMRPCH
Company NameLamar Advertising CompanyPotlatchDeltic Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustrySpecialized REITsSpecialized REITs
Market Capitalization12.41 billion USD3.29 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateAugust 2, 1996March 17, 1980
Security TypeREITREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LAMR and PCH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LAMR vs. PCH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLAMRPCH
5-Day Price Return1.15%-2.83%
13-Week Price Return2.85%6.32%
26-Week Price Return-4.58%-3.97%
52-Week Price Return2.43%2.19%
Month-to-Date Return0.29%4.04%
Year-to-Date Return0.71%8.38%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.03M0.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.62M0.57M
3-Month Volatility23.83%28.03%
Beta1.421.13

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LAMR

41.90%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
37.66%
Q3
20.19%
Median
8.96%
Q1
6.32%
Min
-1.71%

LAMR’s Return on Equity of 41.90% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PCH

2.08%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
37.66%
Q3
20.19%
Median
8.96%
Q1
6.32%
Min
-1.71%

PCH’s Return on Equity of 2.08% is in the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

LAMR vs. PCH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Specialized REITs industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LAMR

19.72%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
67.81%
Q3
40.70%
Median
25.91%
Q1
11.01%
Min
1.95%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

PCH

3.94%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
67.81%
Q3
40.70%
Median
25.91%
Q1
11.01%
Min
1.95%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

LAMR vs. PCH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Specialized REITs industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LAMR

27.46%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
107.13%
Q3
55.10%
Median
41.03%
Q1
17.97%
Min
5.94%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

PCH

5.86%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
107.13%
Q3
55.10%
Median
41.03%
Q1
17.97%
Min
5.94%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

LAMR vs. PCH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Specialized REITs industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLAMRPCH
Return on Equity (TTM)41.90%2.08%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.68%1.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)19.72%3.94%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)27.46%5.86%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)81.58%13.79%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LAMR

0.58

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
1.13
Median
0.59
Q1
0.35
Min
0.09

LAMR’s Current Ratio of 0.58 aligns with the median group of the Specialized REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PCH

1.13

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
1.13
Median
0.59
Q1
0.35
Min
0.09

PCH’s Current Ratio of 1.13 is in the upper quartile for the Specialized REITs industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LAMR vs. PCH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Specialized REITs industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LAMR

3.73

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
4.54
Q3
3.26
Median
1.09
Q1
0.58
Min
0.16

LAMR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Specialized REITs industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.73. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

PCH

0.54

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
4.54
Q3
3.26
Median
1.09
Q1
0.58
Min
0.16

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, PCH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LAMR vs. PCH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Specialized REITs industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LAMR

3.24

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.05
Median
2.99
Q1
2.10
Min
1.28

LAMR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.24 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Specialized REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PCH

1.28

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.05
Median
2.99
Q1
2.10
Min
1.28

In the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, PCH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.28 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

LAMR vs. PCH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Specialized REITs industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLAMRPCH
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.581.13
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.580.75
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.730.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.241.28

Growth

Revenue Growth

LAMR vs. PCH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LAMR vs. PCH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LAMR

5.16%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
7.06%
Q3
5.09%
Median
4.51%
Q1
3.18%
Min
1.78%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.16%, LAMR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Specialized REITs industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

PCH

4.23%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
7.06%
Q3
5.09%
Median
4.51%
Q1
3.18%
Min
1.78%

PCH’s Dividend Yield of 4.23% is consistent with its peers in the Specialized REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LAMR vs. PCH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Specialized REITs industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LAMR

104.38%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
295.93%
Q3
182.11%
Median
119.31%
Q1
65.42%
Min
43.86%

LAMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 104.38% is within the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PCH

338.69%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
295.93%
Q3
182.11%
Median
119.31%
Q1
65.42%
Min
43.86%

At 338.69%, PCH’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

LAMR vs. PCH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Specialized REITs industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLAMRPCH
Dividend Yield (TTM)5.16%4.23%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)104.38%338.69%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LAMR

27.77

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
85.59
Q3
64.69
Median
29.09
Q1
18.22
Min
8.79

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

PCH

80.06

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
85.59
Q3
64.69
Median
29.09
Q1
18.22
Min
8.79

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

LAMR vs. PCH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Specialized REITs industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LAMR

5.48

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
14.35
Q3
9.60
Median
8.74
Q1
5.61
Min
1.63

In the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, LAMR’s P/S Ratio of 5.48 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

PCH

3.16

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
14.35
Q3
9.60
Median
8.74
Q1
5.61
Min
1.63

In the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, PCH’s P/S Ratio of 3.16 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LAMR vs. PCH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Specialized REITs industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LAMR

13.73

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
11.33
Q3
5.68
Median
2.69
Q1
1.81
Min
0.71

At 13.73, LAMR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialized REITs industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PCH

1.57

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
11.33
Q3
5.68
Median
2.69
Q1
1.81
Min
0.71

PCH’s P/B Ratio of 1.57 is in the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

LAMR vs. PCH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Specialized REITs industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLAMRPCH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.7780.06
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.483.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)13.731.57
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.8836.58