Seek Returns logo

KMB vs. KO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KMB and KO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolKMBKO
Company NameKimberly-Clark CorporationThe Coca-Cola Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryHousehold ProductsBeverages
Market Capitalization40.89 billion USD287.40 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KMB and KO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KMB vs. KO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKMBKO
5-Day Price Return0.33%1.21%
13-Week Price Return-3.55%-6.82%
26-Week Price Return-10.94%-5.60%
52-Week Price Return-12.77%-7.07%
Month-to-Date Return-3.72%0.69%
Year-to-Date Return-5.11%7.26%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.89M16.78M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.39M15.89M
3-Month Volatility18.58%13.32%
Beta0.280.40

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KMB

216.14%

Household Products Industry

Max
216.14%
Q3
106.01%
Median
19.09%
Q1
9.92%
Min
-6.34%

In the upper quartile for the Household Products industry, KMB’s Return on Equity of 216.14% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

KO

45.90%

Beverages Industry

Max
45.90%
Q3
22.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
6.35%
Min
-13.21%

In the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, KO’s Return on Equity of 45.90% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

KMB vs. KO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KMB

12.87%

Household Products Industry

Max
14.55%
Q3
12.50%
Median
8.91%
Q1
8.67%
Min
5.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.87% places KMB in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

KO

25.89%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.38%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.43%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.65%

KO’s Net Profit Margin of 25.89% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Beverages industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

KMB vs. KO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KMB

16.21%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.76%
Q3
16.17%
Median
13.11%
Q1
12.17%
Min
6.87%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.21% places KMB in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

KO

29.32%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
20.15%
Median
13.14%
Q1
10.74%
Min
1.24%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.32% places KO in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

KMB vs. KO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKMBKO
Return on Equity (TTM)216.14%45.90%
Return on Assets (TTM)14.55%11.80%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.87%25.89%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.21%29.32%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.45%61.43%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KMB

0.77

Household Products Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.96
Median
1.21
Q1
0.79
Min
0.50

KMB’s Current Ratio of 0.77 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

KO

1.21

Beverages Industry

Max
3.52
Q3
2.00
Median
1.22
Q1
0.87
Min
0.55

KO’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Beverages industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KMB vs. KO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KMB

5.73

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.58
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 5.73, KMB operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Household Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

KO

1.73

Beverages Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.14
Median
0.74
Q1
0.37
Min
0.00

KO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Beverages industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.73. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

KMB vs. KO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KMB

14.18

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
17.04
Q1
9.99
Min
5.60

KMB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.18 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KO

67.13

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
42.68
Median
10.96
Q1
3.86
Min
0.81

KO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 67.13 is in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

KMB vs. KO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKMBKO
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.771.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.560.84
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)5.731.73
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.1867.13

Growth

Revenue Growth

KMB vs. KO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KMB vs. KO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KMB

4.01%

Household Products Industry

Max
6.79%
Q3
3.95%
Median
2.83%
Q1
2.02%
Min
1.34%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.01%, KMB offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Household Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

KO

2.95%

Beverages Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
4.37%
Median
3.32%
Q1
1.98%
Min
0.00%

KO’s Dividend Yield of 2.95% is consistent with its peers in the Beverages industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

KMB vs. KO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KMB

67.61%

Household Products Industry

Max
187.99%
Q3
110.64%
Median
74.63%
Q1
58.31%
Min
30.76%

KMB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 67.61% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KO

69.42%

Beverages Industry

Max
188.65%
Q3
104.55%
Median
72.60%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

KO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 69.42% is within the typical range for the Beverages industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KMB vs. KO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKMBKO
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.01%2.95%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)67.61%69.42%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KMB

16.86

Household Products Industry

Max
30.25
Q3
22.11
Median
20.35
Q1
15.19
Min
13.52

KMB’s P/E Ratio of 16.86 is within the middle range for the Household Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

KO

23.51

Beverages Industry

Max
35.25
Q3
22.66
Median
17.17
Q1
13.65
Min
4.77

A P/E Ratio of 23.51 places KO in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

KMB vs. KO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KMB

2.17

Household Products Industry

Max
4.23
Q3
2.58
Median
1.98
Q1
1.29
Min
1.03

KMB’s P/S Ratio of 2.17 aligns with the market consensus for the Household Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KO

6.09

Beverages Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.24
Median
1.34
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

With a P/S Ratio of 6.09, KO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Beverages industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

KMB vs. KO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KMB

33.66

Household Products Industry

Max
46.10
Q3
21.55
Median
5.33
Q1
2.16
Min
1.41

KMB’s P/B Ratio of 33.66 is in the upper tier for the Household Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

KO

10.59

Beverages Industry

Max
6.90
Q3
4.23
Median
2.20
Q1
1.51
Min
0.69

At 10.59, KO’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Beverages industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

KMB vs. KO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKMBKO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.8623.51
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.176.09
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)33.6610.59
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.4943.95