Seek Returns

KIM vs. WY: Kimco Realty vs. Weyerhaeuser Stock Comparison

How do Kimco Realty (KIM) and Weyerhaeuser (WY) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Kimco Realty (KIM) and Weyerhaeuser (WY) both fall under the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group, but KIM is classified in Retail REITs while WY is classified in Specialized REITs.

Both Kimco Realty (KIM) and Weyerhaeuser (WY) are REITs — read their payout ratios and P/E alongside FFO (funds from operations) rather than at face value.

Company profile comparison for Kimco Realty (KIM) and Weyerhaeuser (WY)
Profile ItemKIMWY
NameKimco Realty CorporationWeyerhaeuser Co.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS Industry GroupEquity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
GICS IndustryRetail REITsSpecialized REITs
GICS Sub-IndustryRetail REITsTimber REITs
Market Capitalization16.96 billion USD15.11 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 22, 1991May 3, 1973
Security TypeREITREIT

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

KIM
WY
GSPC
Loading price history…
Kimco Realty (KIM) vs. Weyerhaeuser (WY), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Kimco Realty (KIM) and Weyerhaeuser (WY). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Kimco Realty (KIM) and Weyerhaeuser (WY). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Kimco Realty (KIM) and Weyerhaeuser (WY)
MetricKIMWY
Total Return (1Y)31.58%-5.11%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)18.90%-7.92%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)6.77%-7.23%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

KIM
WY
GSPC
Loading price history…
Kimco Realty (KIM) vs. Weyerhaeuser (WY), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Kimco Realty (KIM) and Weyerhaeuser (WY). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Kimco Realty (KIM) and Weyerhaeuser (WY)
MetricKIMWY
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)18.46%28.77%
Beta (5Y)0.890.91
Max Drawdown (5Y)-33.61%-48.91%
Avg. Volume (3M)5.37M7.22M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
KIM and WY are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Kimco Realty (KIM) and Weyerhaeuser (WY)
MetricKIMWY
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.48-0.33
Sortino Ratio (1Y)2.48-0.51

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Kimco Realty (KIM) at 7.20% and Weyerhaeuser (WY) at 4.81% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

KIM

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

7.20%

Max
22.74%
Q3
10.54%
KIM
7.20%
Median
6.38%
Q1
1.69%
Min
-10.86%

WY

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

4.81%

Max
22.74%
Q3
10.54%
Median
6.38%
WY
4.81%
Q1
1.69%
Min
-10.86%
Loading chart…
Kimco Realty (KIM) vs. Weyerhaeuser (WY): A comparison of their ROE against the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Neither Kimco Realty (KIM) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) nor Weyerhaeuser (WY) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) is well served by net margin: heavy depreciation makes net income a poor profitability proxy in their businesses, where FFO-based measures are the standard read.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Kimco Realty (KIM) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and Weyerhaeuser (WY) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Kimco Realty (KIM) and Weyerhaeuser (WY)
MetricKIMWY
ROE (TTM)7.20%4.81%
ROA (TTM)2.43%0.84%
Net Margin (TTM)----
Operating Margin (TTM)----
Gross Margin (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

Kimco Realty (KIM) at 5.06% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Weyerhaeuser (WY) at -3.07% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Kimco Realty (KIM) vs. Weyerhaeuser (WY): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

EPS growth isn't a meaningful figure for either Kimco Realty (KIM) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) or Weyerhaeuser (WY) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) under our convention.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Kimco Realty (KIM) and Weyerhaeuser (WY)
MetricKIMWY
Revenue Growth (YoY)5.06%-3.07%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)7.40%-12.15%
EPS Growth (YoY)----
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)----

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Kimco Realty (KIM) at 1.05 and Weyerhaeuser (WY) at 1.82 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

KIM

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

1.05

Max
4.19
Q3
2.11
Median
1.31
KIM
1.05
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

WY

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

1.82

Max
4.19
Q3
2.11
WY
1.82
Median
1.31
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06
Loading chart…
Kimco Realty (KIM) vs. Weyerhaeuser (WY): A comparison of their current ratio against the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Weyerhaeuser (WY) at 0.57 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Kimco Realty (KIM) at 0.83 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

KIM

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

0.83

Max
2.72
Q3
1.59
Median
0.99
KIM
0.83
Q1
0.72
Min
0.20

WY

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

0.57

Max
2.72
Q3
1.59
Median
0.99
Q1
0.72
WY
0.57
Min
0.20
Loading chart…
Kimco Realty (KIM) vs. Weyerhaeuser (WY): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Kimco Realty (KIM) and Weyerhaeuser (WY)
MetricKIMWY
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.051.82
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.830.57
Net Debt / EBITDA5.956.85

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Kimco Realty (KIM) at 4.14% and Weyerhaeuser (WY) at 3.88% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

KIM

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

4.14%

Max
8.62%
Q3
5.95%
Median
4.34%
KIM
4.14%
Q1
3.26%
Min
0.00%

WY

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

3.88%

Max
8.62%
Q3
5.95%
Median
4.34%
WY
3.88%
Q1
3.26%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Kimco Realty (KIM) vs. Weyerhaeuser (WY): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

An earnings-based payout ratio fits neither Kimco Realty (KIM) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) nor Weyerhaeuser (WY) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): their distributions are mandated and conventionally measured against FFO, so the accounting-earnings ratio overstates both.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Kimco Realty (KIM) and Weyerhaeuser (WY)
MetricKIMWY
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.14%3.88%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)----

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

P/E ratio is not a meaningful valuation yardstick for either Kimco Realty (KIM) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) or Weyerhaeuser (WY) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): depreciation suppresses reported earnings in their businesses, and price-to-FFO is the conventional yardstick instead.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Weyerhaeuser (WY) at 2.16 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Kimco Realty (KIM) at 7.72 prices around its industry’s middle — WY costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

KIM

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

7.72

Max
14.47
Q3
8.02
KIM
7.72
Median
5.98
Q1
3.27
Min
0.43

WY

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

2.16

Max
14.47
Q3
8.02
Median
5.98
Q1
3.27
WY
2.16
Min
0.43
Loading chart…
Kimco Realty (KIM) vs. Weyerhaeuser (WY): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Kimco Realty (KIM) at 1.67 and Weyerhaeuser (WY) at 1.61 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

KIM

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

1.67

Max
4.06
Q3
2.53
KIM
1.67
Median
1.64
Q1
1.06
Min
0.21

WY

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

1.61

Max
4.06
Q3
2.53
Median
1.64
WY
1.61
Q1
1.06
Min
0.21
Loading chart…
Kimco Realty (KIM) vs. Weyerhaeuser (WY): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Kimco Realty (KIM) and Weyerhaeuser (WY)
MetricKIMWY
P/E Ratio (TTM)----
P/S Ratio (TTM)7.722.16
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.671.61
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)----