KIM vs. WY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 4, 2025

Here’s a clear look at KIM and WY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both KIM and WY are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

Symbol	KIM	WY
Company Name	Kimco Realty Corporation	Weyerhaeuser Company
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Real Estate	Real Estate
GICS Industry	Retail REITs	Specialized REITs
Market Capitalization	14.62 billion USD	18.00 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	November 22, 1991	May 3, 1973
Security Type	REIT	REIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KIM and WY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KIM vs. WY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	KIM	WY
5-Day Price Return	0.19%	0.73%
13-Week Price Return	1.61%	-3.50%
26-Week Price Return	2.43%	-15.74%
52-Week Price Return	-7.32%	-26.55%
Month-to-Date Return	-1.51%	-4.17%
Year-to-Date Return	-8.15%	-11.94%
10-Day Avg. Volume	3.72M	5.27M
3-Month Avg. Volume	4.05M	4.47M
3-Month Volatility	19.31%	28.46%
Beta	1.09	1.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KIM

5.66%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 16.17%
Q3: 9.03%
Median: 6.12%
Q1: 3.81%
Min: -3.17%

KIM’s Return on Equity of 5.66% is on par with the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

WY

2.88%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 21.01%
Q3: 17.78%
Median: 8.42%
Q1: 6.83%
Min: -1.71%

WY’s Return on Equity of 2.88% is in the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

KIM vs. WY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KIM

28.54%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 75.53%
Q3: 49.82%
Median: 28.35%
Q1: 20.68%
Min: -8.79%

In the Retail REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

WY

3.97%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 70.20%
Q3: 38.00%
Median: 23.98%
Q1: 6.53%
Min: -1.41%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

KIM vs. WY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KIM

32.62%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 102.11%
Q3: 58.14%
Median: 38.63%
Q1: 25.00%
Min: -8.87%

In the Retail REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

WY

8.19%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 107.13%
Q3: 54.03%
Median: 42.12%
Q1: 16.28%
Min: 5.86%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

KIM vs. WY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	KIM	WY
Return on Equity (TTM)	5.66%	2.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.99%	1.69%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	28.54%	3.97%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	32.62%	8.19%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	68.89%	17.25%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KIM

1.47

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 1.74
Q3: 0.97
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.07

KIM’s Current Ratio of 1.47 is in the upper quartile for the Retail REITs industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

WY

1.04

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 1.74
Q3: 1.08
Median: 0.58
Q1: 0.34
Min: 0.10

WY’s Current Ratio of 1.04 aligns with the median group of the Specialized REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KIM vs. WY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Retail REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KIM

0.78

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 2.06
Q3: 1.27
Median: 0.92
Q1: 0.68
Min: 0.34

KIM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

WY

0.54

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 5.86
Q3: 3.80
Median: 1.22
Q1: 0.73
Min: 0.16

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, WY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

KIM vs. WY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Retail REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KIM

2.05

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 4.31
Q3: 3.30
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.29
Min: -0.08

KIM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

WY

2.99

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 5.24
Q3: 3.92
Median: 2.94
Q1: 2.07
Min: 1.14

WY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.99 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Specialized REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KIM vs. WY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	KIM	WY
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.47	1.04
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.47	0.57
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.78	0.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	2.05	2.99

Growth

Revenue Growth

KIM vs. WY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KIM vs. WY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KIM

4.75%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 6.92%
Q3: 5.10%
Median: 4.50%
Q1: 3.89%
Min: 2.37%

KIM’s Dividend Yield of 4.75% is consistent with its peers in the Retail REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WY

3.32%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 6.92%
Q3: 5.29%
Median: 4.71%
Q1: 3.25%
Min: 2.16%

WY’s Dividend Yield of 3.32% is consistent with its peers in the Specialized REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

KIM vs. WY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KIM

117.45%

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 195.40%
Q3: 125.60%
Median: 85.02%
Q1: 51.07%
Min: 12.86%

KIM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 117.45% is within the typical range for the Retail REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WY

212.90%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 338.69%
Q3: 202.75%
Median: 125.21%
Q1: 107.89%
Min: 16.73%

WY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 212.90% is in the upper quartile for the Specialized REITs industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

KIM vs. WY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	KIM	WY
Dividend Yield (TTM)	4.75%	3.32%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	117.45%	212.90%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KIM

24.75

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 42.04
Q3: 28.02
Median: 21.98
Q1: 15.79
Min: 6.89

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Retail REITs industry.

WY

64.11

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 119.95
Q3: 64.19
Median: 27.78
Q1: 23.88
Min: 5.25

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

KIM vs. WY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KIM

7.06

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 13.05
Q3: 9.54
Median: 6.95
Q1: 5.59
Min: 3.06

KIM’s P/S Ratio of 7.06 aligns with the market consensus for the Retail REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

WY

2.54

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 10.35
Q3: 8.84
Median: 8.28
Q1: 5.39
Min: 1.68

In the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, WY’s P/S Ratio of 2.54 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

KIM vs. WY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KIM

1.35

Retail REITs Industry

Max: 2.70
Q3: 1.64
Median: 1.05
Q1: 0.91
Min: 0.58

KIM’s P/B Ratio of 1.35 is within the conventional range for the Retail REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

WY

1.96

Specialized REITs Industry

Max: 13.73
Q3: 7.48
Median: 2.56
Q1: 1.70
Min: 0.71

WY’s P/B Ratio of 1.96 is within the conventional range for the Specialized REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KIM vs. WY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Retail REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	KIM	WY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	24.75	64.11
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	7.06	2.54
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.35	1.96
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	30.46	36.13