Seek Returns logo

KIM vs. VTR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KIM and VTR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both KIM and VTR are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

SymbolKIMVTR
Company NameKimco Realty CorporationVentas, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryRetail REITsHealth Care REITs
Market Capitalization14.62 billion USD31.96 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 22, 1991May 5, 1997
Security TypeREITREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KIM and VTR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KIM vs. VTR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKIMVTR
5-Day Price Return0.19%2.21%
13-Week Price Return1.61%10.83%
26-Week Price Return2.43%2.65%
52-Week Price Return-7.32%9.63%
Month-to-Date Return-1.51%2.81%
Year-to-Date Return-8.15%18.85%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.72M3.53M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.05M3.01M
3-Month Volatility19.31%14.86%
Beta1.090.91

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KIM

5.66%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
16.17%
Q3
9.03%
Median
6.12%
Q1
3.81%
Min
-3.17%

KIM’s Return on Equity of 5.66% is on par with the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VTR

1.71%

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
10.39%
Q3
6.95%
Median
5.08%
Q1
2.35%
Min
1.71%

VTR’s Return on Equity of 1.71% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care REITs industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

KIM vs. VTR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KIM

28.54%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
75.53%
Q3
49.82%
Median
28.35%
Q1
20.68%
Min
-8.79%

In the Retail REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

VTR

3.61%

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
58.90%
Q3
41.92%
Median
27.62%
Q1
7.47%
Min
-32.95%

In the Health Care REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

KIM vs. VTR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KIM

32.62%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
102.11%
Q3
58.14%
Median
38.63%
Q1
25.00%
Min
-8.87%

In the Retail REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

VTR

14.06%

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
92.65%
Q3
49.54%
Median
38.20%
Q1
14.70%
Min
-22.55%

In the Health Care REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

KIM vs. VTR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKIMVTR
Return on Equity (TTM)5.66%1.71%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.99%0.74%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.54%3.61%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.62%14.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)68.89%42.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KIM

1.47

Retail REITs Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
0.97
Median
0.55
Q1
0.32
Min
0.07

KIM’s Current Ratio of 1.47 is in the upper quartile for the Retail REITs industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

VTR

0.34

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
2.86
Q3
1.87
Median
1.49
Q1
0.26
Min
0.06

VTR’s Current Ratio of 0.34 aligns with the median group of the Health Care REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KIM vs. VTR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Retail REITs and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KIM

0.78

Retail REITs Industry

Max
2.06
Q3
1.27
Median
0.92
Q1
0.68
Min
0.34

KIM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VTR

1.10

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
1.00
Median
0.95
Q1
0.73
Min
0.35

VTR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care REITs industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.10. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

KIM vs. VTR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Retail REITs and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KIM

2.05

Retail REITs Industry

Max
4.31
Q3
3.30
Median
2.15
Q1
1.29
Min
-0.08

KIM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VTR

1.08

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
5.10
Q3
2.88
Median
1.84
Q1
1.17
Min
0.43

In the lower quartile for the Health Care REITs industry, VTR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.08 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

KIM vs. VTR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKIMVTR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.470.34
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.470.34
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.781.10
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.051.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

KIM vs. VTR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KIM vs. VTR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KIM

4.75%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
6.92%
Q3
5.10%
Median
4.50%
Q1
3.89%
Min
2.37%

KIM’s Dividend Yield of 4.75% is consistent with its peers in the Retail REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VTR

2.43%

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
8.56%
Q3
6.40%
Median
6.02%
Q1
3.59%
Min
1.51%

VTR’s Dividend Yield of 2.43% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care REITs industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

KIM vs. VTR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KIM

117.45%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
195.40%
Q3
125.60%
Median
85.02%
Q1
51.07%
Min
12.86%

KIM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 117.45% is within the typical range for the Retail REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VTR

413.76%

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
234.45%
Q3
218.09%
Median
153.06%
Q1
99.53%
Min
0.00%

At 413.76%, VTR’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Health Care REITs industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

KIM vs. VTR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKIMVTR
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.75%2.43%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)117.45%413.76%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KIM

24.75

Retail REITs Industry

Max
42.04
Q3
28.02
Median
21.98
Q1
15.79
Min
6.89

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Retail REITs industry.

VTR

170.56

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
79.81
Q3
46.18
Median
26.23
Q1
23.21
Min
13.95

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Health Care REITs industry.

KIM vs. VTR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KIM

7.06

Retail REITs Industry

Max
13.05
Q3
9.54
Median
6.95
Q1
5.59
Min
3.06

KIM’s P/S Ratio of 7.06 aligns with the market consensus for the Retail REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VTR

6.15

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
20.59
Q3
11.86
Median
7.62
Q1
4.92
Min
3.19

VTR’s P/S Ratio of 6.15 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KIM vs. VTR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Retail REITs and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KIM

1.35

Retail REITs Industry

Max
2.70
Q3
1.64
Median
1.05
Q1
0.91
Min
0.58

KIM’s P/B Ratio of 1.35 is within the conventional range for the Retail REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VTR

2.40

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
2.80
Q3
2.04
Median
1.58
Q1
0.90
Min
0.54

VTR’s P/B Ratio of 2.40 is in the upper tier for the Health Care REITs industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

KIM vs. VTR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Retail REITs and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKIMVTR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.75170.56
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.066.15
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.352.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.4634.43