Seek Returns logo

KEP vs. VST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KEP and VST, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

KEP trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, VST is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolKEPVST
Company NameKorea Electric Power CorporationVistra Corp.
CountrySouth KoreaUnited States
GICS SectorUtilitiesUtilities
GICS IndustryElectric UtilitiesIndependent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers
Market Capitalization21.83 billion USD60.26 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 27, 1994October 5, 2016
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KEP and VST by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KEP vs. VST: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKEPVST
5-Day Price Return2.49%-7.22%
13-Week Price Return19.25%-11.47%
26-Week Price Return78.20%12.70%
52-Week Price Return-7.95%22.92%
Month-to-Date Return11.40%-7.23%
Year-to-Date Return136.41%26.71%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.66M4.73M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.91M4.67M
3-Month Volatility46.96%47.30%
Beta0.431.42

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KEP

15.57%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
23.26%
Q3
15.09%
Median
10.59%
Q1
6.99%
Min
-0.30%

In the upper quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s Return on Equity of 15.57% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

VST

22.56%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
25.91%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.39%
Q1
4.74%
Min
-8.56%

In the upper quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, VST’s Return on Equity of 22.56% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

KEP vs. VST: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KEP

6.78%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
31.47%
Q3
17.33%
Median
11.03%
Q1
7.47%
Min
-3.66%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s Net Profit Margin of 6.78% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

VST

7.01%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
23.58%
Q3
14.86%
Median
11.17%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-2.06%

VST’s Net Profit Margin of 7.01% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

KEP vs. VST: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KEP

12.54%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
44.32%
Q3
25.44%
Median
18.95%
Q1
12.27%
Min
0.08%

KEP’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.54% is around the midpoint for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VST

12.35%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
34.36%
Q3
24.29%
Median
14.23%
Q1
10.71%
Min
4.97%

VST’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.35% is around the midpoint for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KEP vs. VST: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKEPVST
Return on Equity (TTM)15.57%22.56%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.56%3.03%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.78%7.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.54%12.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-19.73%8.71%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KEP

0.46

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
1.15
Median
0.97
Q1
0.77
Min
0.30

KEP’s Current Ratio of 0.46 falls into the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VST

0.99

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
1.27
Median
0.78
Q1
0.66
Min
0.37

VST’s Current Ratio of 0.99 aligns with the median group of the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KEP vs. VST: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KEP

3.18

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
3.47
Q3
1.87
Median
1.32
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

KEP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electric Utilities industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.18. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

VST

3.60

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
4.11
Q3
2.70
Median
1.78
Q1
1.07
Min
0.18

VST’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.60. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

KEP vs. VST: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KEP

2.57

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
18.68
Q3
9.38
Median
3.32
Q1
2.57
Min
-3.31

KEP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VST

5.47

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
10.03
Q3
6.97
Median
2.59
Q1
1.35
Min
-1.62

VST’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.47 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KEP vs. VST: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKEPVST
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.460.99
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.290.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.183.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.575.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

KEP vs. VST: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KEP vs. VST: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KEP

0.84%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
6.61%
Q3
4.63%
Median
3.38%
Q1
2.30%
Min
0.00%

KEP’s Dividend Yield of 0.84% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

VST

0.79%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
8.60%
Q3
5.18%
Median
3.40%
Q1
1.95%
Min
0.00%

VST’s Dividend Yield of 0.79% is in the lower quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

KEP vs. VST: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KEP

6.37%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
140.33%
Q3
85.57%
Median
63.88%
Q1
34.29%
Min
0.00%

KEP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.37% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

VST

27.61%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
127.17%
Q3
82.67%
Median
41.34%
Q1
23.02%
Min
0.00%

VST’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.61% is within the typical range for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KEP vs. VST: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKEPVST
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.84%0.79%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.37%27.61%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KEP

4.81

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
33.63
Q3
21.86
Median
17.07
Q1
10.96
Min
3.11

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s P/E Ratio of 4.81 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

VST

54.30

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
43.83
Q3
23.74
Median
11.48
Q1
8.49
Min
5.02

At 54.30, VST’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

KEP vs. VST: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KEP

0.33

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
6.73
Q3
3.36
Median
1.96
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s P/S Ratio of 0.33 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

VST

3.80

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
3.80
Median
2.27
Q1
0.91
Min
0.45

VST’s P/S Ratio of 3.80 is in the upper echelon for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

KEP vs. VST: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KEP

0.59

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
2.98
Q3
1.95
Median
1.51
Q1
1.04
Min
0.37

KEP’s P/B Ratio of 0.59 is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

VST

12.74

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
3.68
Q3
2.10
Median
1.38
Q1
0.89
Min
0.38

At 12.74, VST’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

KEP vs. VST: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electric Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKEPVST
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)4.8154.30
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.333.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.5912.74
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.3156.97