Seek Returns logo

JBL vs. NTES: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at JBL and NTES, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

JBL is a standard domestic listing, while NTES trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolJBLNTES
Company NameJabil Inc.NetEase, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyCommunication Services
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsEntertainment
Market Capitalization22.31 billion USD85.71 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 3, 1993June 30, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of JBL and NTES by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

JBL vs. NTES: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolJBLNTES
5-Day Price Return1.39%2.43%
13-Week Price Return22.89%8.67%
26-Week Price Return27.85%30.86%
52-Week Price Return91.26%63.74%
Month-to-Date Return-6.84%3.66%
Year-to-Date Return44.48%51.41%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.45M0.97M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.36M1.00M
3-Month Volatility32.85%25.35%
Beta1.260.66

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

JBL

38.64%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 38.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

NTES

24.25%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

In the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s Return on Equity of 24.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

JBL vs. NTES: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

JBL

2.02%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

NTES

31.19%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.19% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

JBL vs. NTES: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

JBL

4.08%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.08% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

NTES

31.43%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.43% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

JBL vs. NTES: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolJBLNTES
Return on Equity (TTM)38.64%24.25%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.25%17.31%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.02%31.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.08%31.43%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)8.86%63.17%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

JBL

0.98

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

JBL’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

NTES

3.23

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

NTES’s Current Ratio of 3.23 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JBL vs. NTES: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

JBL

2.24

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.24, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

NTES

0.08

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

NTES’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

JBL vs. NTES: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

JBL

11.12

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.12 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

NTES

161.13

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 161.13, NTES demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

JBL vs. NTES: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolJBLNTES
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.983.23
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.473.10
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.240.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.12161.13

Growth

Revenue Growth

JBL vs. NTES: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

JBL vs. NTES: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

JBL

0.17%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

NTES

2.18%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.18%, NTES offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Entertainment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

JBL vs. NTES: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

JBL

6.59%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.59% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NTES

36.90%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTES’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.90% is within the typical range for the Entertainment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

JBL vs. NTES: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolJBLNTES
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.17%2.18%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.59%36.90%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

JBL

37.97

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 37.97 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NTES

16.94

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s P/E Ratio of 16.94 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

JBL vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

JBL

0.77

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.77 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

NTES

5.28

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

NTES’s P/S Ratio of 5.28 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

JBL vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

JBL

14.04

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

At 14.04, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NTES

4.09

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

NTES’s P/B Ratio of 4.09 is within the conventional range for the Entertainment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

JBL vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolJBLNTES
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)37.9716.94
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.775.28
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)14.044.09
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.8213.09