J vs. MMM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 22, 2025

Here’s a clear look at J and MMM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	J	MMM
Company Name	Jacobs Solutions Inc.	3M Company
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Professional Services	Industrial Conglomerates
Market Capitalization	18.19 billion USD	85.33 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	January 2, 1962
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of J and MMM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

J vs. MMM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	J	MMM
5-Day Price Return	3.54%	5.58%
13-Week Price Return	20.58%	6.57%
26-Week Price Return	14.01%	5.17%
52-Week Price Return	28.02%	29.86%
Month-to-Date Return	7.27%	7.36%
Year-to-Date Return	13.89%	24.10%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.86M	3.24M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.79M	3.62M
3-Month Volatility	19.70%	25.27%
Beta	0.82	1.05

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

J

4.22%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 52.17%
Q3: 30.06%
Median: 22.21%
Q1: 11.67%
Min: -13.44%

J’s Return on Equity of 4.22% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 21.93%
Q3: 14.23%
Median: 7.81%
Q1: 5.91%
Min: -3.58%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

J vs. MMM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

J

1.88%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 26.06%
Q3: 13.34%
Median: 7.88%
Q1: 3.50%
Min: -2.93%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, J’s Net Profit Margin of 1.88% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 18.70%
Q3: 12.58%
Median: 9.26%
Q1: 3.87%
Min: -2.26%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

J vs. MMM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

J

7.12%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 35.84%
Q3: 19.38%
Median: 12.54%
Q1: 7.36%
Min: -5.21%

J’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.12% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 25.69%
Q3: 17.03%
Median: 12.85%
Q1: 8.81%
Min: -0.73%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

J vs. MMM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	J	MMM
Return on Equity (TTM)	4.22%	91.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)	1.46%	9.93%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	1.88%	16.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	7.12%	19.46%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	24.99%	41.11%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

J

1.39

Professional Services Industry

Max: 2.45
Q3: 1.65
Median: 1.26
Q1: 1.10
Min: 0.47

J’s Current Ratio of 1.39 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 2.19
Q3: 1.64
Median: 1.38
Q1: 1.13
Min: 0.61

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

J vs. MMM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

J

0.66

Professional Services Industry

Max: 2.63
Q3: 1.44
Median: 0.91
Q1: 0.49
Min: 0.00

J’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.66 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 2.27
Q3: 1.47
Median: 0.99
Q1: 0.66
Min: 0.21

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

J vs. MMM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

J

6.77

Professional Services Industry

Max: 39.67
Q3: 20.05
Median: 11.07
Q1: 5.36
Min: -2.22

J’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.77 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 11.17
Q3: 8.02
Median: 5.88
Q1: 2.73
Min: -2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

J vs. MMM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	J	MMM
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.39	1.72
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.36	1.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.66	3.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	6.77	-15.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

J vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

J vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

J

0.83%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 5.28%
Q3: 2.51%
Median: 1.63%
Q1: 0.62%
Min: 0.00%

J’s Dividend Yield of 0.83% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MMM

1.83%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 10.17%
Q3: 5.53%
Median: 3.14%
Q1: 1.88%
Min: 0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.83% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

J vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

J

42.29%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 109.23%
Q3: 64.39%
Median: 47.00%
Q1: 20.35%
Min: 0.00%

J’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 42.29% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 181.91%
Q3: 95.57%
Median: 50.60%
Q1: 35.01%
Min: 1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

J vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	J	MMM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.83%	1.83%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	42.29%	39.27%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

J

108.87

Professional Services Industry

Max: 49.59
Q3: 36.59
Median: 28.13
Q1: 18.55
Min: 10.07

At 108.87, J’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Professional Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MMM

21.41

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 36.98
Q3: 22.09
Median: 12.18
Q1: 8.93
Min: 5.63

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 21.41 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

J vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

J

2.05

Professional Services Industry

Max: 9.54
Q3: 5.11
Median: 2.10
Q1: 0.75
Min: 0.11

J’s P/S Ratio of 2.05 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MMM

3.43

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 3.60
Q3: 2.10
Median: 0.68
Q1: 0.42
Min: 0.11

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.43 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

J vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

J

4.09

Professional Services Industry

Max: 13.75
Q3: 8.87
Median: 4.35
Q1: 2.43
Min: 0.54

J’s P/B Ratio of 4.09 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 4.89
Q3: 2.51
Median: 1.06
Q1: 0.60
Min: 0.27

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

J vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	J	MMM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	108.87	21.41
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.05	3.43
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	4.09	18.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	34.59	31.57