ITUB vs. SMFG: Itaú Unibanco vs. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) are both classified in the Diversified Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Both Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) trade as ADRs — their core financials are comparable, but keep FX, depositary-program fees, and dividend withholding in view for each.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) at 20.96% delivers above-range ROE, while Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) at 8.57% falls into the bottom quartile — a wide split in profit generated from equity.

Both Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) at 32.46% and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) at 27.82% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) in Banks and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) at 14.32% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) at 4.21% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) at 36.62% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) at 9.21% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for SMFG.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) in Banks and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) in Banks and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) at 40.54% and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) at 334.33% yield above their industries’ entire benchmark ranges — high enough that dividend safety, not income, becomes the first question.

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) at 33.62% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) at 70.75% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) at 9.12 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) at 13.47 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for ITUB, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) in Banks and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) at 1.45 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) at 1.79 carries an above-peer premium to book — ITUB is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics