ITUB vs. RF: Itaú Unibanco vs. Regions Financial Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) and Regions Financial (RF) both belong to the Banks industry, though ITUB is classified under Diversified Banks while RF falls under Regional Banks.

Regions Financial (RF) trades as ordinary local shares, while Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) at 20.96% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Regions Financial (RF) at 12.38%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Both Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) at 32.46% and Regions Financial (RF) at 31.29% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) in Banks and Regions Financial (RF) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Regions Financial (RF) at 6.25% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) at 4.21% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Both Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) at 9.21% and Regions Financial (RF) at 19.17% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) in Banks and Regions Financial (RF) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) in Banks and Regions Financial (RF) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Regions Financial (RF) at 3.85% earns its spot in the top quartile of its industry’s yields; Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) at 40.54% is past the top of its own peer range — territory where a dividend-safety check matters more than the headline number.

Both Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) at 70.75% and Regions Financial (RF) at 43.27% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) at 9.12 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Regions Financial (RF) at 11.10 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for ITUB, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) in Banks and Regions Financial (RF) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

Regions Financial (RF) at 1.46 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Itaú Unibanco (ITUB) at 1.79 carries an above-peer premium to book — ITUB is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics