Seek Returns logo

ITT vs. MTZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ITT and MTZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolITTMTZ
Company NameITT Inc.MasTec, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization14.39 billion USD15.46 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 15, 1995February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ITT and MTZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ITT vs. MTZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolITTMTZ
5-Day Price Return-3.33%-4.38%
13-Week Price Return11.66%8.11%
26-Week Price Return22.75%22.63%
52-Week Price Return20.24%37.97%
Month-to-Date Return-0.21%-5.85%
Year-to-Date Return29.26%41.19%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.38M0.78M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.40M0.96M
3-Month Volatility30.86%39.45%
Beta1.371.94

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ITT

17.96%

Machinery Industry

Max
30.85%
Q3
19.99%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.44%
Min
-7.69%

ITT’s Return on Equity of 17.96% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MTZ

11.17%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.67%
Median
11.05%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-2.38%

MTZ’s Return on Equity of 11.17% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ITT vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ITT

12.67%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.28%
Q3
10.99%
Median
7.89%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-1.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.67% places ITT in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MTZ

2.41%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.49%
Median
3.88%
Q1
2.38%
Min
-2.27%

MTZ’s Net Profit Margin of 2.41% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ITT vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ITT

17.46%

Machinery Industry

Max
27.20%
Q3
15.91%
Median
11.33%
Q1
7.73%
Min
0.23%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.46% places ITT in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MTZ

4.20%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.70%
Median
5.84%
Q1
3.94%
Min
-1.78%

MTZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.20% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ITT vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolITTMTZ
Return on Equity (TTM)17.96%11.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.85%3.61%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.67%2.41%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.46%4.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)35.00%12.54%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ITT

1.52

Machinery Industry

Max
3.27
Q3
2.16
Median
1.75
Q1
1.32
Min
0.70

ITT’s Current Ratio of 1.52 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MTZ

1.33

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.26
Q3
1.54
Median
1.25
Q1
0.99
Min
0.65

MTZ’s Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ITT vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ITT

0.37

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.45
Q1
0.23
Min
0.00

ITT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MTZ

0.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.33
Median
0.64
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

MTZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.76 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ITT vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ITT

20.74

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
36.46
Median
13.55
Q1
7.73
Min
-1.43

ITT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.74 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MTZ

2.54

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
30.69
Q3
15.27
Median
7.88
Q1
4.27
Min
-6.49

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.54 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ITT vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolITTMTZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.521.33
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.991.25
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.370.76
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)20.742.54

Growth

Revenue Growth

ITT vs. MTZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ITT vs. MTZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ITT

0.76%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.98%
Q3
2.83%
Median
1.89%
Q1
1.17%
Min
0.00%

ITT’s Dividend Yield of 0.76% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.25%
Median
1.76%
Q1
0.17%
Min
0.00%

MTZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ITT vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ITT

22.66%

Machinery Industry

Max
209.29%
Q3
102.41%
Median
62.34%
Q1
29.36%
Min
0.00%

ITT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.66% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
144.77%
Q3
74.39%
Median
50.47%
Q1
8.02%
Min
0.00%

MTZ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ITT vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolITTMTZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.76%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.66%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ITT

29.79

Machinery Industry

Max
46.28
Q3
29.52
Median
24.18
Q1
16.92
Min
7.99

A P/E Ratio of 29.79 places ITT in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MTZ

45.81

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
39.16
Q3
24.60
Median
17.05
Q1
13.85
Min
1.65

At 45.81, MTZ’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ITT vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ITT

3.78

Machinery Industry

Max
5.25
Q3
2.82
Median
1.74
Q1
0.99
Min
0.27

ITT’s P/S Ratio of 3.78 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MTZ

1.10

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.86
Q3
1.52
Median
0.80
Q1
0.48
Min
0.12

MTZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.10 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ITT vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ITT

5.18

Machinery Industry

Max
7.18
Q3
4.18
Median
2.71
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

ITT’s P/B Ratio of 5.18 is in the upper tier for the Machinery industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MTZ

5.40

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.53
Q3
3.97
Median
1.90
Q1
1.22
Min
0.24

MTZ’s P/B Ratio of 5.40 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ITT vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolITTMTZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)29.7945.81
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.781.10
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.185.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.3331.95