Seek Returns logo

IRM vs. JLL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IRM and JLL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

A key difference in structure is that IRM is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), a company that primarily invests in income-generating real estate, whereas JLL is a conventional stock.

SymbolIRMJLL
Company NameIron Mountain IncorporatedJones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustrySpecialized REITsReal Estate Management & Development
Market Capitalization30.20 billion USD14.29 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 1, 1996July 17, 1997
Security TypeREITCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IRM and JLL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IRM vs. JLL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIRMJLL
5-Day Price Return1.45%-1.74%
13-Week Price Return2.33%16.62%
26-Week Price Return19.59%17.23%
52-Week Price Return-13.94%12.09%
Month-to-Date Return0.31%-2.39%
Year-to-Date Return-2.71%17.83%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.63M0.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.53M0.44M
3-Month Volatility28.14%24.19%
Beta1.151.48

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IRM

85.19%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
21.01%
Q3
17.78%
Median
8.42%
Q1
6.83%
Min
-1.71%

IRM’s Return on Equity of 85.19% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

JLL

8.26%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
20.58%
Q3
9.51%
Median
3.59%
Q1
0.57%
Min
-9.76%

JLL’s Return on Equity of 8.26% is on par with the norm for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IRM vs. JLL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IRM

0.64%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
70.20%
Q3
38.00%
Median
23.98%
Q1
6.53%
Min
-1.41%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

JLL

2.29%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
61.27%
Q3
26.17%
Median
9.35%
Q1
2.35%
Min
-23.71%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, JLL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.29% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

IRM vs. JLL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IRM

16.17%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
107.13%
Q3
54.03%
Median
42.12%
Q1
16.28%
Min
5.86%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

JLL

3.72%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
114.22%
Q3
51.26%
Median
23.27%
Q1
7.24%
Min
-44.62%

JLL’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.72% is in the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

IRM vs. JLL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIRMJLL
Return on Equity (TTM)85.19%8.26%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.22%3.29%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)0.64%2.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.17%3.72%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)66.77%57.03%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IRM

0.63

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
1.08
Median
0.58
Q1
0.34
Min
0.10

IRM’s Current Ratio of 0.63 aligns with the median group of the Specialized REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JLL

1.10

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
2.25
Median
1.48
Q1
1.00
Min
0.04

JLL’s Current Ratio of 1.10 aligns with the median group of the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IRM vs. JLL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IRM

685.59

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.86
Q3
3.80
Median
1.22
Q1
0.73
Min
0.16

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 685.59, IRM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Specialized REITs industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

JLL

0.45

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.32
Median
0.85
Q1
0.40
Min
0.00

JLL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.45 is typical for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IRM vs. JLL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IRM

1.36

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
3.92
Median
2.94
Q1
2.07
Min
1.14

In the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, IRM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.36 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

JLL

4.25

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
29.35
Q3
12.97
Median
3.68
Q1
1.32
Min
-3.02

JLL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.25 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IRM vs. JLL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIRMJLL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.631.10
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.541.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)685.590.45
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.364.25

Growth

Revenue Growth

IRM vs. JLL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IRM vs. JLL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IRM

2.84%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
6.92%
Q3
5.29%
Median
4.71%
Q1
3.25%
Min
2.16%

IRM’s Dividend Yield of 2.84% is in the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

JLL

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
6.97%
Q3
3.55%
Median
2.31%
Q1
0.48%
Min
0.00%

JLL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IRM vs. JLL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IRM

400.99%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
338.69%
Q3
202.75%
Median
125.21%
Q1
107.89%
Min
16.73%

At 400.99%, IRM’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

JLL

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
310.03%
Q3
143.62%
Median
62.44%
Q1
29.44%
Min
0.00%

JLL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IRM vs. JLL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIRMJLL
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.84%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)400.99%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IRM

728.24

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
119.95
Q3
64.19
Median
27.78
Q1
23.88
Min
5.25

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

JLL

25.02

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
56.83
Q3
31.11
Median
15.41
Q1
11.32
Min
3.67

JLL’s P/E Ratio of 25.02 is within the middle range for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IRM vs. JLL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IRM

4.67

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
10.35
Q3
8.84
Median
8.28
Q1
5.39
Min
1.68

In the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, IRM’s P/S Ratio of 4.67 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

JLL

0.57

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
12.20
Q3
5.67
Median
2.73
Q1
0.97
Min
0.06

In the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, JLL’s P/S Ratio of 0.57 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

IRM vs. JLL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IRM

1,254.25

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
13.73
Q3
7.48
Median
2.56
Q1
1.70
Min
0.71

At 1,254.25, IRM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialized REITs industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

JLL

1.72

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.36
Q3
1.20
Median
0.75
Q1
0.39
Min
0.06

JLL’s P/B Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper tier for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

IRM vs. JLL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIRMJLL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)728.2425.02
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.670.57
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1,254.251.72
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)429.0710.28