IR vs. TXT: Ingersoll Rand vs. Textron Stock Comparison
How do Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Textron (TXT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Textron (TXT) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but IR is classified in Machinery while TXT is classified in Aerospace & Defense.
| Profile Item | IR | TXT |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Ingersoll Rand Inc. | Textron Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Aerospace & Defense |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 31.87 billion USD | 14.15 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | May 12, 2017 | February 21, 1973 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | IR | TXT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 12.39% | 3.94% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 9.19% | 4.49% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 8.02% | 2.30% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | IR | TXT |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 34.08% | 29.18% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 0.87 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -36.62% | -37.33% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 4.27M | 1.72M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | IR | TXT |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.24 | -0.01 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.37 | -0.02 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 13.41% and Textron (TXT) at 12.48% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
13.41%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- IR
- 13.41%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
TXT
Capital Goods industry group
12.48%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- TXT
- 12.48%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 17.20% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Textron (TXT) at 6.30%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
17.20%
- Max
- 27.47%
- IR
- 17.20%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
TXT
Capital Goods industry group
6.30%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- TXT
- 6.30%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 18.79% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Textron (TXT) at 9.33%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
18.79%
- Max
- 36.60%
- IR
- 18.79%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
TXT
Capital Goods industry group
9.33%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- TXT
- 9.33%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | IR | TXT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 13.41% | 12.48% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.98% | 4.51% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 17.20% | 6.30% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 18.79% | 9.33% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 42.57% | 17.53% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 5.75% and Textron (TXT) at 8.01% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Textron (TXT) at 18.02% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at -29.61% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | IR | TXT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.75% | 8.01% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.95% | 4.77% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -29.61% | 18.02% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -0.46% | 8.42% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 1.69 and Textron (TXT) at 1.80 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
1.69
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- IR
- 1.69
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
TXT
Capital Goods industry group
1.80
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- TXT
- 1.80
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.46 and Textron (TXT) at 0.52 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.46
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- IR
- 0.46
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
TXT
Capital Goods industry group
0.52
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- TXT
- 0.52
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | IR | TXT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.69 | 1.80 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.46 | 0.52 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.76 | 1.54 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.10% and Textron (TXT) at 0.09% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.10%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- IR
- 0.10%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TXT
Capital Goods industry group
0.09%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- TXT
- 0.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 2.27% and Textron (TXT) at 1.44% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
2.27%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- IR
- 2.27%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TXT
Capital Goods industry group
1.44%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- TXT
- 1.44%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | IR | TXT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.10% | 0.09% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 2.27% | 1.44% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Textron (TXT) at 15.03 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 23.51 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for TXT, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
23.51
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- IR
- 23.51
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
TXT
Capital Goods industry group
15.03
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- TXT
- 15.03
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Textron (TXT) at 0.92 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.96 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.96
- Max
- 7.54
- IR
- 3.96
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
TXT
Capital Goods industry group
0.92
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- TXT
- 0.92
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Textron (TXT) at 1.74 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.03 is valued near its industry’s middle — TXT is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.03
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- IR
- 3.03
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
TXT
Capital Goods industry group
1.74
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- TXT
- 1.74
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IR | TXT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.51 | 15.03 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.96 | 0.92 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.03 | 1.74 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.19% | 5.35% |