IR vs. TXT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 20, 2025

Here’s a clear look at IR and TXT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	IR	TXT
Company Name	Ingersoll Rand Inc.	Textron Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Machinery	Aerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization	32.10 billion USD	14.50 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	May 12, 2017	February 21, 1973
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IR and TXT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IR vs. TXT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	IR	TXT
5-Day Price Return	5.89%	5.13%
13-Week Price Return	-4.10%	5.92%
26-Week Price Return	-12.56%	8.09%
52-Week Price Return	-8.49%	-4.10%
Month-to-Date Return	-4.56%	4.60%
Year-to-Date Return	-10.71%	6.35%
10-Day Avg. Volume	4.48M	1.33M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.25M	1.60M
3-Month Volatility	34.83%	26.33%
Beta	1.45	1.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IR

5.06%

Machinery Industry

Max: 34.68%
Q3: 19.06%
Median: 13.13%
Q1: 8.53%
Min: -4.87%

IR’s Return on Equity of 5.06% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

TXT

11.31%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 43.89%
Q3: 22.42%
Median: 12.50%
Q1: 5.21%
Min: -6.24%

TXT’s Return on Equity of 11.31% is on par with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IR vs. TXT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IR

7.04%

Machinery Industry

Max: 19.74%
Q3: 11.24%
Median: 8.13%
Q1: 5.38%
Min: -1.11%

IR’s Net Profit Margin of 7.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TXT

5.80%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 14.54%
Q3: 8.08%
Median: 6.17%
Q1: 2.49%
Min: -1.63%

TXT’s Net Profit Margin of 5.80% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IR vs. TXT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IR

15.07%

Machinery Industry

Max: 26.63%
Q3: 16.15%
Median: 11.27%
Q1: 7.72%
Min: -4.91%

IR’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.07% is around the midpoint for the Machinery industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TXT

5.50%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 16.63%
Q3: 10.38%
Median: 8.29%
Q1: 6.21%
Min: 0.95%

TXT’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.50% is in the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

IR vs. TXT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	IR	TXT
Return on Equity (TTM)	5.06%	11.31%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.85%	4.85%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	7.04%	5.80%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	15.07%	5.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	43.74%	19.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IR

2.29

Machinery Industry

Max: 3.83
Q3: 2.32
Median: 1.72
Q1: 1.28
Min: 0.78

IR’s Current Ratio of 2.29 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TXT

1.70

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 3.09
Q3: 1.98
Median: 1.23
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.02

TXT’s Current Ratio of 1.70 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IR vs. TXT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IR

0.47

Machinery Industry

Max: 1.49
Q3: 0.75
Median: 0.44
Q1: 0.26
Min: 0.00

IR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.47 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TXT

0.50

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 1.70
Q3: 1.04
Median: 0.68
Q1: 0.41
Min: 0.00

TXT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50 is typical for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IR vs. TXT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IR

6.23

Machinery Industry

Max: 67.55
Q3: 33.79
Median: 13.87
Q1: 7.97
Min: -1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, IR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.23 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

TXT

10.72

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 36.57
Q3: 19.90
Median: 7.04
Q1: 2.40
Min: -7.63

TXT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.72 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IR vs. TXT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	IR	TXT
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.29	1.70
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.63	0.71
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.47	0.50
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	6.23	10.72

Growth

Revenue Growth

IR vs. TXT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IR vs. TXT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IR

0.10%

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.32%
Q3: 2.84%
Median: 1.87%
Q1: 1.09%
Min: 0.00%

IR’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

TXT

0.08%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 2.03%
Q3: 1.22%
Median: 0.43%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TXT’s Dividend Yield of 0.08% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

IR vs. TXT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IR

3.95%

Machinery Industry

Max: 202.17%
Q3: 98.65%
Median: 55.54%
Q1: 29.03%
Min: 0.00%

IR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.95% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

TXT

1.85%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 83.87%
Q3: 49.90%
Median: 16.48%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TXT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 1.85% is within the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IR vs. TXT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	IR	TXT
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.10%	0.08%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	3.95%	1.85%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IR

61.73

Machinery Industry

Max: 53.66
Q3: 31.29
Median: 22.00
Q1: 16.18
Min: 7.00

At 61.73, IR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Machinery industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

TXT

17.34

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 65.97
Q3: 54.11
Median: 34.53
Q1: 23.66
Min: 0.00

In the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, TXT’s P/E Ratio of 17.34 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

IR vs. TXT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IR

4.35

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.04
Q3: 2.72
Median: 1.67
Q1: 1.04
Min: 0.24

IR’s P/S Ratio of 4.35 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TXT

1.01

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 8.07
Q3: 4.49
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.39
Min: 0.00

In the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, TXT’s P/S Ratio of 1.01 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

IR vs. TXT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IR

3.33

Machinery Industry

Max: 7.23
Q3: 3.90
Median: 2.52
Q1: 1.47
Min: 0.49

IR’s P/B Ratio of 3.33 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TXT

1.95

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 13.67
Q3: 7.92
Median: 4.65
Q1: 2.68
Min: 0.82

TXT’s P/B Ratio of 1.95 is in the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

IR vs. TXT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	IR	TXT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	61.73	17.34
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	4.35	1.01
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	3.33	1.95
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	24.65	19.15