IR vs. TDG: Ingersoll Rand vs. TransDigm Stock Comparison
How do Ingersoll Rand (IR) and TransDigm (TDG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Ingersoll Rand (IR) and TransDigm (TDG) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but IR is classified in Machinery while TDG is classified in Aerospace & Defense.
| Profile Item | IR | TDG |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Ingersoll Rand Inc. | TransDigm Group Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Aerospace & Defense |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 31.87 billion USD | 66.17 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | May 12, 2017 | March 15, 2006 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | IR | TDG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 12.39% | -3.42% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 9.19% | 14.26% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 8.02% | 16.86% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | IR | TDG |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 34.08% | 28.03% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 0.94 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -36.62% | -29.05% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 4.27M | 369.72K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | IR | TDG |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.24 | -0.27 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.37 | -0.38 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Ingersoll Rand (IR) earns 13.41% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; TransDigm (TDG) has no ROE this period.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
13.41%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- IR
- 13.41%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
TDG
Capital Goods industry group
--
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
- TDG
- --
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 17.20% and TransDigm (TDG) at 21.28% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
17.20%
- Max
- 27.47%
- IR
- 17.20%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
TDG
Capital Goods industry group
21.28%
- Max
- 27.47%
- TDG
- 21.28%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
TransDigm (TDG) at 46.01% shows unusually strong operating efficiency — above its industry’s operating margin range — and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 18.79% also operates in the top quartile.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
18.79%
- Max
- 36.60%
- IR
- 18.79%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
TDG
Capital Goods industry group
46.01%
- TDG
- 46.01%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | IR | TDG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 13.41% | -- |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.98% | 11.82% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 17.20% | 21.28% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 18.79% | 46.01% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 42.57% | 59.82% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 5.75% and TransDigm (TDG) at 11.22% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
TransDigm (TDG) at 25.21% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at -29.61% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | IR | TDG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.75% | 11.22% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.95% | 17.61% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -29.61% | 25.21% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -0.46% | 33.78% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 1.69 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while TransDigm (TDG) at 3.02 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
1.69
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- IR
- 1.69
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
TDG
Capital Goods industry group
3.02
- Max
- 5.22
- TDG
- 3.02
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Ingersoll Rand (IR) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.46 against its industry range, while TransDigm (TDG) reports no figure this period.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.46
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- IR
- 0.46
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
TDG
Capital Goods industry group
--
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
- TDG
- --
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | IR | TDG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.69 | 3.02 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.46 | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.76 | 6.03 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
TransDigm (TDG) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ingersoll Rand (IR) reports a yield of 0.10%, ranking against industry peers normally.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.10%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- IR
- 0.10%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TDG
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- TDG
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
TransDigm (TDG) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ingersoll Rand (IR) reports a payout of 2.27%, ranking against industry peers normally.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
2.27%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- IR
- 2.27%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TDG
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- TDG
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | IR | TDG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.10% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 2.27% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 23.51 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while TransDigm (TDG) at 36.31 sits in the richer quartile — TDG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
23.51
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- IR
- 23.51
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
TDG
Capital Goods industry group
36.31
- Max
- 59.38
- TDG
- 36.31
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.96 and TransDigm (TDG) at 6.61 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.96
- Max
- 7.54
- IR
- 3.96
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
TDG
Capital Goods industry group
6.61
- Max
- 7.54
- TDG
- 6.61
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
TransDigm (TDG) reports a negative P/B ratio of -6.74, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Ingersoll Rand (IR) reports 3.03, ranking against industry peers normally.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.03
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- IR
- 3.03
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
TDG
Capital Goods industry group
-6.74
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
- TDG
- -6.74
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IR | TDG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.51 | 36.31 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.96 | 6.61 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.03 | -6.74 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.19% | 2.20% |