IR vs. SYM: Ingersoll Rand vs. Symbotic Stock Comparison
How do Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Symbotic (SYM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Ingersoll Rand (IR) and Symbotic (SYM) are both classified in the Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components sub-industry within the broader Machinery industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | IR | SYM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Ingersoll Rand Inc. | Symbotic Inc. Class A Common Stock |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 31.87 billion USD | 22.29 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | May 12, 2017 | March 9, 2021 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | IR | SYM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 12.39% | -44.66% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 9.19% | 6.78% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 8.02% | 30.90% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Symbotic (SYM) carries a highly aggressive beta of 2.05, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Ingersoll Rand (IR) is closer to market-like at 1.12 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.
| Metric | IR | SYM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 34.08% | 78.15% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 2.05 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -36.62% | -72.46% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 4.27M | 1.61M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | IR | SYM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.24 | -0.63 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.37 | -0.93 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 13.41% and Symbotic (SYM) at 4.39% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
13.41%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- IR
- 13.41%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
SYM
Capital Goods industry group
4.39%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- SYM
- 4.39%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 17.20% keeps a top-quartile share of each sales dollar as profit, while Symbotic (SYM) at 0.31% keeps a bottom-quartile share.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
17.20%
- Max
- 27.47%
- IR
- 17.20%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
SYM
Capital Goods industry group
0.31%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- SYM
- 0.31%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 18.79% carries a top-quartile operating margin, while Symbotic (SYM) at 4.59% operates in the bottom quartile.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
18.79%
- Max
- 36.60%
- IR
- 18.79%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
SYM
Capital Goods industry group
4.59%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- SYM
- 4.59%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | IR | SYM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 13.41% | 4.39% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.98% | 0.32% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 17.20% | 0.31% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 18.79% | 4.59% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 42.57% | 21.27% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Symbotic (SYM) at 25.65% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 5.75% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for SYM.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Ingersoll Rand (IR) reports EPS growth of -29.61%, ranked against its industry; Symbotic (SYM) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | IR | SYM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.75% | 25.65% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.95% | 55.87% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -29.61% | -- |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -0.46% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 1.69 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Symbotic (SYM) at 1.33 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for SYM.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
1.69
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- IR
- 1.69
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
SYM
Capital Goods industry group
1.33
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- SYM
- 1.33
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Symbotic (SYM) at 0.02 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.46 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.46
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- IR
- 0.46
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
SYM
Capital Goods industry group
0.02
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- SYM
- 0.02
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | IR | SYM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.69 | 1.33 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.46 | 0.02 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.76 | -30.44 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Symbotic (SYM) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ingersoll Rand (IR) reports a yield of 0.10%, ranking against industry peers normally.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.10%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- IR
- 0.10%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SYM
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- SYM
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Symbotic (SYM) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ingersoll Rand (IR) reports a payout of 2.27%, ranking against industry peers normally.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
2.27%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- IR
- 2.27%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SYM
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- SYM
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | IR | SYM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.10% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 2.27% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 23.51 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Symbotic (SYM) at 460.25 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for SYM’s trailing earnings.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
23.51
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- IR
- 23.51
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
SYM
Capital Goods industry group
460.25
- SYM
- 460.25
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both look expensive on sales: Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.96 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Symbotic (SYM) at 8.42 prices even higher, above its industry range.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.96
- Max
- 7.54
- IR
- 3.96
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
SYM
Capital Goods industry group
8.42
- SYM
- 8.42
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.03 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Symbotic (SYM) at 6.70 carries an above-peer premium to book — SYM is pricier on assets.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.03
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- IR
- 3.03
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
SYM
Capital Goods industry group
6.70
- Max
- 9.66
- SYM
- 6.70
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IR | SYM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.51 | 460.25 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.96 | 8.42 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.03 | 6.70 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.19% | 2.46% |