IR vs. QXO: Ingersoll Rand vs. QXO Stock Comparison
How do Ingersoll Rand (IR) and QXO (QXO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Ingersoll Rand (IR) and QXO (QXO) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but IR is classified in Machinery while QXO is classified in Trading Companies & Distributors.
| Profile Item | IR | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Ingersoll Rand Inc. | QXO Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Trading Companies & Distributors |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components | Trading Companies & Distributors |
| Market Capitalization | 31.87 billion USD | 11.99 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | May 12, 2017 | April 17, 2012 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | IR | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 12.39% | -19.11% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 9.19% | -16.39% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 8.02% | -17.91% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
QXO (QXO) carries a highly aggressive beta of 2.28, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Ingersoll Rand (IR) is closer to market-like at 1.12 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.
| Metric | IR | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 34.08% | 68.10% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 2.28 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -36.62% | -95.70% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 4.27M | 19.01M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | IR | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.24 | -0.34 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.37 | -0.55 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
QXO (QXO) reports a negative ROE of -4.60%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Ingersoll Rand (IR) reports 13.41%, ranking against industry peers normally.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
13.41%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- IR
- 13.41%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
-4.60%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- QXO
- -4.60%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
QXO (QXO) reports a negative net margin of -5.17%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Ingersoll Rand (IR) reports 17.20%, ranking against industry peers normally.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
17.20%
- Max
- 27.47%
- IR
- 17.20%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
-5.17%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- QXO
- -5.17%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 18.79% carries a top-quartile operating margin, while QXO (QXO) at 1.29% operates in the bottom quartile.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
18.79%
- Max
- 36.60%
- IR
- 18.79%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
1.29%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- QXO
- 1.29%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | IR | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 13.41% | -4.60% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.98% | -0.27% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 17.20% | -5.17% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 18.79% | 1.29% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 42.57% | 24.54% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
QXO (QXO) at 11,924.96% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 5.75%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
EPS Growth
Neither side shows strong earnings momentum: Ingersoll Rand (IR) at -29.61% sits in the bottom EPS growth quartile, and QXO (QXO) at -672.73% is weaker still, below its industry range.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | IR | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.75% | 11,924.96% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.95% | 433.80% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -29.61% | -672.73% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -0.46% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 1.69 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while QXO (QXO) at 4.12 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
1.69
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- IR
- 1.69
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
4.12
- Max
- 5.22
- QXO
- 4.12
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.46 and QXO (QXO) at 0.57 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.46
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- IR
- 0.46
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
0.57
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- QXO
- 0.57
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | IR | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.69 | 4.12 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.46 | 0.57 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.76 | 7.20 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
QXO (QXO) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ingersoll Rand (IR) reports a yield of 0.10%, ranking against industry peers normally.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.10%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- IR
- 0.10%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- QXO
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
QXO (QXO) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ingersoll Rand (IR) reports a payout of 2.27%, ranking against industry peers normally.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
2.27%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- IR
- 2.27%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- QXO
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | IR | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.10% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 2.27% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Ingersoll Rand (IR) trades at 23.51 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while QXO (QXO) has no P/E ratio this period.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
23.51
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- IR
- 23.51
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
--
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
- QXO
- --
P/S Ratio (TTM)
QXO (QXO) at 1.21 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.96 sits in the pricier quartile — IR costs more per dollar of sales.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.96
- Max
- 7.54
- IR
- 3.96
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
1.21
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- QXO
- 1.21
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
QXO (QXO) at 0.90 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.03 is valued near its industry’s middle — QXO is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.03
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- IR
- 3.03
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
0.90
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- QXO
- 0.90
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IR | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.51 | -- |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.96 | 1.21 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.03 | 0.90 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.19% | -21.23% |