Seek Returns logo

IR vs. POOL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at IR and POOL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolIRPOOL
Company NameIngersoll Rand Inc.Pool Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryMachineryDistributors
Market Capitalization31.67 billion USD12.00 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 12, 2017October 13, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of IR and POOL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

IR vs. POOL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolIRPOOL
5-Day Price Return-0.20%-1.03%
13-Week Price Return-1.87%5.92%
26-Week Price Return-7.01%-5.70%
52-Week Price Return-11.60%-7.66%
Month-to-Date Return-5.85%4.31%
Year-to-Date Return-11.92%-5.72%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.47M0.53M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.01M0.60M
3-Month Volatility33.93%30.83%
Beta1.451.12

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

IR

5.06%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

IR’s Return on Equity of 5.06% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

POOL

31.34%

Distributors Industry

Max
18.85%
Q3
17.85%
Median
13.11%
Q1
11.23%
Min
11.19%

POOL’s Return on Equity of 31.34% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Distributors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

IR vs. POOL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

IR

7.04%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

IR’s Net Profit Margin of 7.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

POOL

7.79%

Distributors Industry

Max
5.04%
Q3
4.92%
Median
4.56%
Q1
4.55%
Min
4.54%

POOL’s Net Profit Margin of 7.79% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Distributors industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

IR vs. POOL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

IR

15.07%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

IR’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.07% is around the midpoint for the Machinery industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

POOL

11.13%

Distributors Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
7.80%
Median
5.53%
Q1
3.65%
Min
3.17%

An Operating Profit Margin of 11.13% places POOL in the upper quartile for the Distributors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IR vs. POOL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolIRPOOL
Return on Equity (TTM)5.06%31.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.85%11.64%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.04%7.79%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.07%11.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)43.74%29.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

IR

2.29

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

IR’s Current Ratio of 2.29 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

POOL

2.52

Distributors Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
1.72
Median
1.48
Q1
1.24
Min
1.15

POOL’s Current Ratio of 2.52 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Distributors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

IR vs. POOL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

IR

0.47

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

IR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.47 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

POOL

0.95

Distributors Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.98
Median
0.75
Q1
0.52
Min
0.46

POOL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.95 is typical for the Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IR vs. POOL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

IR

6.23

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, IR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.23 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

POOL

12.28

Distributors Industry

Max
13.15
Q3
10.84
Median
5.59
Q1
4.01
Min
3.80

POOL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.28 is in the upper quartile for the Distributors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

IR vs. POOL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolIRPOOL
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.292.52
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.630.82
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.470.95
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.2312.28

Growth

Revenue Growth

IR vs. POOL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

IR vs. POOL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

IR

0.10%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

IR’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

POOL

1.52%

Distributors Industry

Max
44.83%
Q3
35.02%
Median
4.81%
Q1
3.26%
Min
1.54%

POOL’s Dividend Yield of 1.52% is below the typical range for the Distributors industry. This indicates that shareholder returns are likely driven more by potential capital appreciation than by dividend income.

IR vs. POOL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

IR

3.95%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

IR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.95% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

POOL

44.67%

Distributors Industry

Max
1,122.47%
Q3
858.23%
Median
55.08%
Q1
44.32%
Min
34.92%

POOL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.67% is within the typical range for the Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IR vs. POOL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolIRPOOL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.10%1.52%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)3.95%44.67%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

IR

60.90

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

At 60.90, IR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Machinery industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

POOL

29.38

Distributors Industry

Max
28.99
Q3
25.04
Median
23.42
Q1
13.71
Min
6.24

At 29.38, POOL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Distributors industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

IR vs. POOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

IR

4.29

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

IR’s P/S Ratio of 4.29 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

POOL

2.29

Distributors Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
1.14
Median
0.96
Q1
0.61
Min
0.28

With a P/S Ratio of 2.29, POOL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Distributors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

IR vs. POOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

IR

3.33

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

IR’s P/B Ratio of 3.33 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

POOL

8.44

Distributors Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
3.57
Median
3.12
Q1
2.41
Min
1.47

At 8.44, POOL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Distributors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

IR vs. POOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolIRPOOL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)60.9029.38
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.292.29
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.338.44
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)24.3224.87